Centreon vs NetCrunch comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7, while AdRem Software is ranked #73. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
7,395 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

5,011 Views
2,606 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Centreon compete in the network monitoring category. NetCrunch holds an advantage in pricing and support, benefiting budget-conscious users, whereas Centreon is favored for its advanced features and value, attracting users who need in-depth insights.

Features: NetCrunch is known for real-time monitoring, automated mapping, and comprehensive alerting capabilities. Centreon provides advanced analytics, an extensive plugin ecosystem, and flexible reporting features.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch can improve its scalability, integration with third-party tools, and customization options for larger networks. Centreon could enhance user interface simplicity, reduce setup complexity, and streamline update processes to appeal to a wider audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is appreciated for straightforward setup and robust customer support, enabling quicker deployment. Centreon's deployment is more involved but supported by detailed documentation and a helpful community.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch offers a cost-effective solution with low setup costs and quick ROI through efficient network management. Centreon's setup costs may be higher, but it offers long-term ROI benefits for enterprises needing detailed monitoring capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NetCrunch

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (27th), Log Management (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
NetCrunch	0.7%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Another feature we use is Business Activity, which provides us with an end-user perspective when a service is down or isn't working correctly. This is helpful when monitoring the KPIs. When we see a device or server that isn't working, we find the root cause."

"I find the product's scalability to be one of the most valuable features since it allows us to add unlimited devices for monitoring and to set up additional polling servers without additional license cost or downtime in our monitoring."

"I really like the filtering capabilities of it. You can easily tell what's critical next to what's okay, the state of the services. It's very easy to get the whole picture quickly."

"Valuable features include the ability to schedule downtime, intensity or depth of monitoring which it does, different plugin packs, Centreon MAP, Centreon BI."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"This product provides comprehensive reporting for our top management."

"It is decentralized, which is better, because you can reduce the load from a single system. Also, you get a better view because it's more independent. Then, for the management, it's nice because they have one central system. With that, they can manage all the other systems, as well. This means they don't have to configure each system by system. They can configure it from one single interface."

"Centreon's user-friendly dashboard and minimal resource requirements lead to significant time and cost savings."

More Centreon pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good; it's very similar to SolarWinds, just with a different interface, and the majority of everything there was beneficial."

"The setup is very intuitive and quick - it all just took a few minutes we were done."

Cons

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Centreon technical support is only available during Central European business hours. When it comes to critical business solutions, there should be a 24/7 hotline that customers can rely on."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours."

"The Home view could be improved by adding customization functions that allow users to change the size of the widgets for a more uniform layout."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

More Centreon cons

"Our network is made up of a lot of Cisco devices, and it needs improvements."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

NetCrunch by AdRem Software is commercial, self-hosted, agentless network and IT infrastructure monitoring software for Windows Server. It monitors network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, logs, websites, traffic flows, and telemetry across on-premises and hybrid IT environments.

The platform is ideal for day-2 operations, supporting 680+ monitoring targets and providing 270+ ready-to-use Monitoring Packs for devices, applications, and operating systems. NetCrunch uses correlated alerting and built-in automation to reduce alert noise and streamline monitoring workflows. Distributed Monitoring Probes extend monitoring to remote and isolated locations. Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Policy-based monitoring: Automatically applies monitoring settings, Monitoring Packs, thresholds, and alerts to matching devices and systems.
Integrated monitoring: Covers network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, websites, logs, telemetry, and network traffic analysis using NetFlow, sFlow, IPFIX, and other flow technologies.
Correlated alerting: Reduces alert noise through event correlation, dependencies, filtering, delay rules, and escalation, with automated response actions.

What benefits should users expect from NetCrunch?

Centralized management: A self-hosted NetCrunch Server provides centralized monitoring, while optional Monitoring Probes extend coverage to remote and isolated locations.
Predictable licensing: Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.
Self-hosted deployment: NetCrunch runs on Windows Server and can monitor infrastructure deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or across hybrid environments.

Because NetCrunch is self-hosted, organizations can keep monitoring data within customer-controlled infrastructure. This makes it suitable for organizations that prioritize data sovereignty and control over monitoring data.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

manufacturing, banking, utilities, energy, universities, healthcare institutions, school districts, military and police entities, non-profit organizations,

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NetCrunch

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.