We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."
"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."
"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."
"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."
"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."
"It is easy to use and deploy."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"The dashboard could include more features."
"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."
"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."
"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."
"The licensing model is confusing."
"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and SCOM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.