CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs Dynatrace comparison

CA Application Delivery Ana...

Read 363 Dynatrace reviews

43,355 Views
29,048 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: October 2026).

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 918,970 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Application Delivery Ana...

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dynatrace

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

363

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (2nd), Log Management (6th), Mobile APM (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (2nd), AI Observability (3rd)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1237194

Senior Solution Director, DevOps at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Good monitoring functionality, but technical support and integration with other products need to be improved

My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances. For CA Spectrum, the integration of this product is something that needs to be improved. Even some of their point products to not integrate very well, and ADA is one of them. The user interface needs to be improved. Technical support needs to be improved.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

AI-driven insights have reduced downtime and improved cross-team collaboration

We encountered some challenges while using Dynatrace. Although the initial setup was smooth, fine-tuning alert thresholds and custom metrics took some time. Another challenge was that Dynatrace charges based on host units, so we had to carefully plan our agent deployments. The licensing model is expensive. Additionally, the complexity of setup is an issue. While OneAgent and auto-discover services are powerful, the setup is more complex compared to other tools such as Prometheus and Grafana. These integrations are simple and basic, but Dynatrace setup requires more complexity based on the environment. For new users wanting to use Dynatrace, it is difficult. However, the AI-related solutions and metrics took us to the next level for identifying and fixing things. Dynatrace requires an agent for operation. OneAgent is powerful, but it is also resource-heavy. On lightweight nodes or older systems, the agent can slightly impact performance. If Dynatrace could implement a lightweight agent behavior, we could make things faster. Additionally, if Dynatrace could add a long-term retention policy so that we could store more data and find fine-grained details, that would help us. While Dynatrace managed edition supports on-premises deployment, the SaaS version depends on cloud connectivity. For highly regulated or air-gapped environments, setup and updates can be challenging. Although the initial setup is smooth, if someone wants to fine-tune it and fully understand the tool end-to-end, it could be tricky.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area, and I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."

"Technical support is excellent."

"Once it is setup and seeing traffic, it is an impressive tool to show potential problems long before the general users are complaining."

"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."

"The dashboards are a really cool feature when I get to talking to clients. I ask them, "Why Dynatrace?" Because I need to push the tools that I have in my application. Then, they explain the monitoring of Dynatrace, saying the rate of the updates and features. They want to go with Dynatrace."

"Within IT, we know that if there’s an alert, there’s a real problem."

"Dynatrace has contributed to significant improvements such as reducing P1 tickets resolution time from four hours to under one hour and drastically cutting alert volumes from between two hundred to four hundred alerts per week down to approximately sixty to one hundred twenty."

"It gives complete stats of the user and what they are doing."

"I would rate the technical support very well. They work with the inside their development teams to get us the best answer, as much as possible."

"The cloud integration, because it allows us to monitor serverless services as well as Docker containers, etc."

"The primary use case is to monitor all our applications. We want a single place where we can monitor all our applications that we are building. Therefore, if something goes wrong, we immediately can find out what went wrong."

"Some of the troubleshooting features for development, the PurePath technology in AppMon, are valuable. The dashboarding gives us some good insight into some fluctuations in some of the application areas."

More Dynatrace pros

Cons

"Hard to setup right, hard to get the conversations right."

"Upgrades can be quite complex."

"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."

"It is not the best product on the market, but it is better than the competition if you were comparing prices."

"The user interface needs improvement."

"Cloud monitoring and reporting need improvement, as well as how to manipulate data and export it to share with business executives."

"The AppMon 6.5 is problematic in configuring. It is little finicky. When we configured the JVM, it did not work."

"The downside is that it is very expensive in terms of the price range."

"Dynatrace must reduce the required resources for on-premise, because they are too high."

"Log analytics in the classic synthetic and RUM tools would be a great addition."

"It would be nice if there were a way that it could be made simpler, given the complexity of the things that we're monitoring."

"I have run into AppMon causing issues. There have been a lot times when I have waited for a release, AppMon does the release, then it ends up taking down our application."

"From what I have heard in the company, Dynatrace is expensive."

More Dynatrace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."

"It's more expensive than other solutions, but worth it. We use full APM monitoring on our primary systems, but only resource monitoring on lesser systems. We shift licenses around our environment when a deeper dive into lesser systems is required."

"From what I have heard in the company, Dynatrace is expensive."

"Dynatrace has a place for everybody. How you use it and what your budgetary limitations are will dictate what you do with it. But it's within everybody's reach. If you're a small organization and you have a large infrastructure, you may not be able to monitor the whole thing. You may have to pick and choose what you want to monitor, and you have the ability to do so. Your available funds are going to dictate that."

"Dynatrace is very good and it's provided a lot of information, it plays a positive role in making your application up to date in the market. If you want to monitor some applications only, it would be cheaper if you did cloud monitoring, but the price benefit depends on the use case."

"The pricing is not bad, but it could be better."

"We have not fully been able to get the full value out of the product. It is expensive compared to other things that we have had in the past. Paying that much and not being able to get the full return on the product is a downgrade. "

"The product is really fast to implement and gives customers instant value. This is important, because it reduces costs on the implementation."

"Dynatrace is still kind of an expensive solution compared to others. But I recognize that they are ahead of the competition when we do a feature by feature comparison."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	303

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Meraki Dashboard vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Competitors

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Avantra vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] product report

CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] report

Download Dynatrace product report

Also Known As

CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent

No data available

Overview

CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

Broadcom

Dynatrace is advancing observability for today’s digital businesses, helping to transform the complexity of modern digital ecosystems into powerful business assets. By leveraging AI-powered insights, Dynatrace enables organizations to analyze, automate, and innovate faster to drive their business forward. To learn more about how Dynatrace can help your business, visit www.dynatrace.com, visit our blog and follow us on LinkedIn and X @dynatrace.

Sample Customers

ERGO

TD Bank, Zurich North America, Accenture, Macquarie, United Airlines, Raymond James, BT, Vodafone, Air France-KLM, TELUS, American Airlines, Air Canada, ADT, Virgin Money

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability