

Worksoft Certify and BrowserStack compete in the test automation and browser testing categories. Worksoft Certify has the upper hand in SAP integration and automation efficiency, while BrowserStack excels in cross-browser and device testing capabilities.
Features: Worksoft Certify offers parameter-driven action steps, lights-out testing, and a built-in framework with strong SAP integration. It supports various platforms such as Siebel, SAP, web-based, and terminal applications. Certify's ease of creating test cases with point-and-click features makes it user-friendly. BrowserStack provides comprehensive device and browser testing across multiple platforms, including features like geolocation testing, real-time debugging, and integration with automated testing frameworks. It supports a wide range of devices for thorough cross-platform testing.
Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could improve its web automation performance, user interface, and ease of version upgrades. Challenges with large script performance and technical support enhancements are needed. BrowserStack faces connectivity issues and lacks support for file uploads in mobile automation. Its high cost and some stability concerns remain areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify is mainly deployed on-premises with some hybrid cloud options, and although customer service is decent, technical support experiences vary. BrowserStack is readily deployed on public cloud platforms, with users noting responsive customer service, despite some delay issues.
Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify's pricing is higher, using a traditional licensing model with significant ROI through reduced testing times. BrowserStack offers competitive pricing within its segment, cost-efficient especially for larger deployments, but is still deemed expensive by some users. Both products provide notable ROI, with Certify strong in long-term savings through automation.
Pipeline executions that used to take eight hours have been reduced to one hour, enhancing continuous deployment and providing quicker feedback cycles.
I think its biggest benefit is how it integrates with our CI/CD, not necessarily giving access to developers for test devices.
I have seen a return on investment with BrowserStack, specifically a 50% reduction in human capacity.
Previously, it used to take more than a week, and now it is happening in less than two days.
After automation, the same coverage was achieved with one to two testers overseeing automated runs that completed overnight, significantly reducing both education time and manual effort.
It brings measurable benefits, and I have observed time-saving, cost-saving, and resource-saving aspects with Worksoft Certify.
BrowserStack customer support is excellent, with knowledgeable staff assisting throughout onboarding, setup, and understanding our needs to provide tailored solutions.
If the L1 support cannot handle the issues, their L2 support is very good, as technical people come and solve the problems.
Complex issues were escalated to senior technical engineers who were knowledgeable and helped resolve them effectively.
Their technical support is responsive, which is good, and their solutions are timely.
BrowserStack's scalability is enhanced by its auto-scaling capabilities on AWS.
They reproduce the same scenario, and then we create the bug ticket for them to fix.
We are an enterprise company. It covers companies of all sizes.
I would assess the scalability of Worksoft Certify as around eight to nine, as it is designed for larger teams and complex environments, facilitating efficient testing and deployment.
When I need to add additional resources to scale up, it is easy to do so to run more tests.
BrowserStack is quite stable for me because it offers many different devices, is always up to date, and has a nice user interface with good user experience.
Sometimes there is slowness in the network, especially when working with AWS-based hosting.
Until we receive confirmation from the support team or Worksoft that a release is stable, we should avoid upgrading because it can have significant impacts.
Regarding stability, I have not seen any lagging, crashing, or downtime with Worksoft Certify; it is very stable nowadays.
It depends on where this particular tool is installed, including the RAM size or the disk size of that machine.
BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services.
Going forward, one way BrowserStack could improve is by incorporating AI concepts to create tests automatically from provided URLs or user intentions, generating scripts without needing users to write automation scripts.
I think false positives are an area where BrowserStack can improve, as I have often seen things working fine on actual devices, but on BrowserStack devices, issues arise due to network slowness or AWS region connectivity problems that cause lag.
Focusing more on AI and its integration with Worksoft would really help enhance our processes.
There are a few areas where I experience limitations in day-to-day usage. This includes UI responsiveness when working with large projects, the effort required to stabilize object identification in dynamic web and Fiori applications, limited flexibility in reporting customization, and there is more room for improvement in API automation testing.
They need to keep working on the mobile interface, the API part, and they need to improve more on web applications.
pricing was that it was a bit on the higher side, around three hundred dollars per user per month.
It is expensive, but worth spending if it is a big project for SAP or any other tool.
What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.
As it is a quality tool, the price is slightly higher, but that is acceptable compared to other tools, especially considering the ROI.
The device farm is one of the positive impacts we have seen from using BrowserStack. We get to run our automation against their full suite of devices, which alleviates the uplift of manual testing.
BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by helping us reduce the human capacity by 50%, with that reduction mostly being in manual testing efforts.
BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization primarily through time savings because it is very easy to use and replicates physical devices for testing, which is crucial since we usually do not have physical devices.
Teams who are planning for automation and are still in manual testing can use Worksoft Certify, and significant time and resources will be reduced.
I believe it will reduce cycle time; we can save 30 to 40%, even 40 to 60% regression cycle time, with innovations we have implemented with Worksoft Certify.
It also covers end-to-end testing across different applications, enabling testing of complete business processes, and integrates with other applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Worksoft Certify | 3.0% |
| BrowserStack | 3.3% |
| Other | 93.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
BrowserStack offers a cloud-based testing solution that facilitates comprehensive cross-platform testing for web and mobile apps, allowing efficient testing across devices, browsers, and operating systems without the need for physical hardware.
It provides integration with project management tools and enables parallel and cross-browser testing, enhancing collaboration with an intuitive interface. Support for real devices offers better insight compared to simulators and helps in reducing manual efforts through automation capabilities. Companies benefit from BrowserStack's vast device range that ensures efficient testing and improved quality at a reduced cost.
What are BrowserStack's key features?In industries like software development and IT services, BrowserStack aids businesses in testing compatibility, performance, and responsiveness across platforms, addressing issues like UI challenges and ensuring legacy application support on older systems. Companies utilize it to refine app quality, using tools such as Selenium and APM for comprehensive test automation.
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.
Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.
What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.