BrowserStack vs Testim comparison

BrowserStack and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. BrowserStack holds a 10.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

4,859 Views
4,470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,803 Views
1,458 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BrowserStack and Testim are competing products in the software testing solutions category. BrowserStack seems to have the upper hand with its extensive device coverage and strong market presence, while Testim offers advanced AI-driven automation capabilities.

Features: BrowserStack provides real-device testing across numerous platforms, seamless integration with various development environments, and robust performance under high traffic. Testim includes AI-powered test authoring, flexible test maintenance, and self-healing tests to reduce test creation time.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could improve by enhancing its AI automation capabilities, reducing initial setup complexity, and offering more competitive pricing. Testim can benefit from streamlining its deployment process, expanding its device coverage, and improving user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack offers straightforward deployment with strong cloud-based testing support, ensuring fast setup and efficient problem resolution. Testim's deployment, though more complex, includes comprehensive customer support and resources for implementation assistance.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack involves a higher initial investment due to extensive device coverage but provides substantial returns via cross-platform compatibility testing. Testim, while costlier owing to AI capabilities, offers high ROI by decreasing test maintenance efforts and speeding up testing cycles.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Testim Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Testim

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,095 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.0%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BrowserStack	10.0%
Testim	3.5%
Other	86.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

More BrowserStack pros

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

More Testim pros

Cons

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

More BrowserStack cons

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is fine."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 32% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 39% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 22% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 15% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

September 2025

Download Testim product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Testim

September 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.