Box vs IBM ECM comparison

Box and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Box is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5, while IBM is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Box holds a 4.1% mindshare in ECM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Box users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Box

Read 42 Box reviews

3,334 Views
1,300 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM ECM

Read 17 IBM ECM reviews

928 Views
900 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Box

IBM ECM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Box and IBM ECM are competitors in the enterprise content management category. Box has the upper hand in pricing and support, while IBM ECM excels with its comprehensive features.

Features: Box offers simplicity, seamless integration, and flexibility, ideal for businesses focusing on accessibility and collaboration across devices. It provides mobile app access, collaboration tools, and integration with Microsoft Office. IBM ECM excels in robust document management, compliance, and security, appealing to organizations needing strict data controls, providing advanced content management, automated processes, and scalability for large document volumes.

Room for Improvement: Box could enhance its compliance features, offer more customization in user permissions, and improve document version control capabilities. IBM ECM might benefit from streamlined user interfaces, more straightforward deployment processes, and reduced initial setup complexity. Both products could work on reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box provides a cloud-based deployment, allowing quick setup with minimal IT resource usage, and offers satisfactory customer service. IBM ECM involves complex on-premises and hybrid deployments, requiring more IT involvement, but delivers detailed customer service throughout the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Box presents a competitive pricing model with a strong ROI, backed by lower setup costs and efficient use. IBM ECM demands a higher upfront investment but offers ROI through its enhanced long-term features and capabilities. Box is noted for its affordability, while IBM ECM justifies its higher cost with comprehensive services.

To learn more, read our detailed Box vs. IBM ECM Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Box vs. IBM ECM

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Box

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (13th), Digital Asset Management (3rd), Document Management Software (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (9th)

IBM ECM

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Box is 4.1%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM ECM is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Box	4.1%
IBM ECM	2.5%
Other	93.4%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Rashad

Senior Projects Manager at Tech-hub

Team collaboration has improved through shared access and real-time synchronization

I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results. I can assess the benefits of Box's file sharing. Box's integration with third-party apps is valuable, especially with Outlook. Box has helped my team's productivity by being very helpful with team collaboration when we are sharing certain shared documents between us. I mostly value Box's automation capabilities. They have helped optimize my business processes by saving time for sharing or sending files between the team. This gives us a shared workspace to work together on the same document or the same ideas. Box's security features have helped my organization meet compliance needs.

Read full review

Thinh Tran

BPM Consultant at TECHCOMBANK

Has supported enterprise document storage but lacks cloud readiness and AI capabilities

The new version of IBM ECM is at the end of support, and we need to migrate to a new version to get open support. We need AI capabilities from IBM ECM for additional functionalities in the next release. Specifically, AI is needed for finding documents. The trend is moving toward AI, and for managing many documents effectively, we need AI capabilities. Currently, IBM ECM only handles physical files, not unstructured files. IBM needs to work alongside customers and share best practices for IBM ECM. Reading the IBM Redbook alone is not sufficient for the knowledge we need to build the best architecture for my company. IBM ECM needs to improve the cloud version, such as compatibility with Amazon Cloud, not only IBM Cloud, to make their product more competitive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable."

"Box is very simple and effective, so I prefer Box."

"Office Integration. The full integration into the Microsoft Office products is just perfect."

"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."

"Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint."

"Governance and ease of use are why I think a lot of people like Box, including ourselves. Basically, we're concerned about what information is being sent to Box, so we use a lot of the Box governance features to make sure that what is being sent to Box is appropriate. If it is not appropriate, it is not allowed to be sent. It is also pretty easy to use. It is the easiest to use for customers and for technologists."

"Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure."

"We can provide controlled access to documents using the product."

More Box pros

"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people."

"I am going to continue using it because it is a good product for enterprise document management."

"The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications."

"The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."

"The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc."

Cons

"Better integration with other solutions is needed."

"With OneDrive, you can continuously save your files over a Box folder. That is something I wish we could have."

"I would love to see the ability to invite collaborators extended to a file level, not just the folder level."

"I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users."

"In future releases, there could be encryption, to have better security."

"Tasks and comments could be easier to see, report, search, and manage."

"One thing that Box would benefit from is a records management component."

"They could integrate better with other platforms."

More Box cons

"I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology."

"I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."

"Currently, IBM ECM only handles physical files, not unstructured files."

"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days."

"I would like to see seamless application integration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of the solution. There is a free version and monthly and yearly subscriptions available."

"Our pricing and licensing is excellent. I'd tell all Higher Ed customers to talk with Internet2 for excellent pricing and support."

"They are very price competitive when pushed. Initially, they come out with a standard list price, but they are willing to be very competitive. The Box price was pretty much equal to or lower than the Citrix price, and Box has more features."

"I have to pay for Box. It could be a little cheaper. On a scale from one to ten, I would give the pricing a five."

"The more you dig, the deeper the level of tools, and the more expensive it becomes."

"It is expensive per head, as you need the enterprise license to get full security and tools. So negotiate a discount!"

"My organization pays for the license."

"I'm in Higher Ed, so we purchase through Internet2-Net+. I absolutely recommend going that route for Higher Ed customers."

More Box pricing and cost advice

"Reach out to local IBM partners."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Box?

The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Box?

I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us. We did not go to payment and other matters like this.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Box?

I believe Box has a lot of features that put it in a good rank among the file-sharing apps. I would like to see features for online collaboration between team members in the future, to open and see...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM ECM?

The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Mic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM ECM?

The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM ECM?

See all answers

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Box

Compared 14% of the time

ShareFile vs Box

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive for Business vs Box

Compared 7% of the time

Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs Box

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Box

Compared 5% of the time

More Box Competitors

Alfresco vs IBM ECM

Compared 16% of the time

IBM FileNet vs IBM ECM

Compared 13% of the time

Nuxeo vs IBM ECM

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs IBM ECM

Compared 9% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM ECM

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM ECM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Box

January 2026

Download Box product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM

January 2026

Download IBM ECM product report

Overview

Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 62,000 businesses, including 59% of the Fortune 500, trust Box to manage content in the cloud.

The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities.

By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies.

Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.

Box

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.

IBM Case Manager on Cloud

IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

IBM

Sample Customers

GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc

KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group

Buyer's Guide

Box vs. IBM ECM

December 2025

Free Report: Box vs. IBM ECM

Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. IBM ECM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Box vs. IBM ECM report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.