Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Blueriq vs KiSSFLOW comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
32nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KiSSFLOW
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
36th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (25th), Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Low-Code Development Platforms (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Blueriq1.0%
KiSSFLOW0.8%
Other98.2%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.
Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities
We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…
Julius Jagdon - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Tools at Motorola Solutions
The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver
When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
 

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."
"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."
"The product costs $15 per user per month."
"The license is very expensive."
"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?
The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.
What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?
The platform's initial setup process could be better.
What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?
We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring contain...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: January 2026.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.