No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Blueriq vs CMW Tracker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
36th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
31st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker1.5%
Blueriq1.1%
Other97.4%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.
Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities
We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"Comindware Tracker features a clear layout with a clean, professional interface that people can use with ease."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"It helps very well with project management, and the workflow process is very easy and fast."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"Comindware Tracker allows non-technical users to build their own workflows and correct them in the course of work, delivers flexibility, and reduces workflow maintenance cost – there’s no more need to engage IT-department, when a head of department realizes that workflow should be adjusted as soon as possible."
"Low code development."
"Comindware Tracker took us from a blind email to fully-transparent automated workflow with travel management and reporting, and improved efficiency, as well as making continuous workflow improvement possible."
 

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"It lacks workflow samples, which would make it even easier for non-technical users to build their own apps."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Great value for the money."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"The price is so reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Government
14%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
24%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima
Comindware Tracker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.