No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Blueriq vs CMW Tracker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
35th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
32nd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (34th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker1.4%
Blueriq1.2%
Other97.4%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.
Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities
We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"Comindware Tracker took us from a blind email to fully-transparent automated workflow with travel management and reporting, and improved efficiency, as well as making continuous workflow improvement possible."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"Comindware Tracker gives a lot of configurations and business rules to the administrators, and these can also be delegated to business users so that they could build and maintain their own step-based workflows."
"Comindware Tracker allows non-technical users to build their own workflows and correct them in the course of work, delivers flexibility, and reduces workflow maintenance cost – there’s no more need to engage IT-department, when a head of department realizes that workflow should be adjusted as soon as possible."
 

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"It lacks workflow samples, which would make it even easier for non-technical users to build their own apps."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"Great value for the money."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"The price is so reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Government
18%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Construction Company
26%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima
Comindware Tracker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: May 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.