No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BigFix vs Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BigFix
Ranking in Patch Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (9th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (33rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (9th)
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Ma...
Ranking in Patch Management
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of BigFix is 4.4%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BigFix4.4%
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management0.8%
Other94.8%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AM
RPA Developer at Hexaware Technologies Limited
Successfully manage endpoint security and compliance while facing integration challenges
I have not come across any difficulties. I integrated it with ILMT (IBM License Metric Tool). It lets us identify all software being used in my organization with BigFix. It provides input of all types of software being used, including details and information about hardware specifications. I am more involved in software licensing and procurement, so I utilize this tool for procuring more licenses if needed for our company. After integration, we get different dashboards showcasing our IBM infrastructure, highlighting various issues in our environment that we can mitigate. I recommend BigFix to others. I rate BigFix a seven out of ten.
AK
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
Patching tasks have become efficient and automated, saving significant time
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and batch management The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Support is very awesome. Every time we have needed something from technical support, they have been on top of everything with a very quick turnaround in the issues that we've had with the product."
"Between the user groups, the community, the AVP support, the direct access via technical route and the PMR support, half the time I don't even need to do a formal PMR because the solutions from the community resolve whatever issues we're having. It's the best community and support based system I've ever used."
"The architecture for patching and the 100% correct reporting makes BigFix stand apart from other solutions."
"We did a proof of concept, looked at the other competitors and after scaling all of them on a matrix, IBM ended up being the best option for us."
"BigFix is easy to use."
"For our clients, what was normally a full 30 days of work is now down to a couple of days to get the data in and actually get out and patch the thing."
"BigFix has drastically reduced the maintenance window period to patch and reboot servers."
"BigFix is a great product; the flexibility of putting together your own relevance and retrieving custom data from any one of your agents is a valuable feature."
"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
 

Cons

"A large infrastructure is required to implement BigFix for a medium-sized organization."
"The self-service application seems to need some work to replace the client UI. There are a lot of pop-ups if you use a baseline as the object that you're setting to a workstation. Unless you're using web UI, the message is not customizable in the user notification."
"The one feature that I would have like to see included (I know it is coming in the next release), is the block function of the newly announced BigFix Detect module."
"I would like to see more integration with external data."
"The only thing that I don't like about BigFix is that it does not support other devices such as printer firmware, router firmware, and things like that. I will be happy if I can control everything and get everything else in there, even if it is just a line item. They can do some enhancements to the Web UI. I am trying to get customers to be able to manage their environment by using Web UI, and it would be good if we can delete endpoints by using Web UI. We should also be able to generate Excel content or data tables from the Web UI without having to go to the console. It is small stuff, and it drives me crazy that I have to go to another console to do these things."
"I would like to see a web UI SDK so we could take what is provided currently and be able to build our own customized web UI for particular customers that want to sell service."
"They need better integration."
"Relay selection and availability needs improvement as an incorrect relay selected can cause network chokes."
"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing."
"The license is subscription-based."
"It might be about $23 a client."
"You are charged per server and per workstation when using BigFix. ManageEngine is a lot cheaper than BigFix. There are some additional costs, such as support."
"The tool's price continues to go up. The cost per endpoint can vary, ranging from approximately 30 to 80 dollars per year. Compared to other products, pricing is in the middle. You need to buy an additional database license, but most users already have it."
"The price of the solution is high. There are not any additional fees from the standard license."
"The price is reasonable, but our customers find it expensive."
"The cost is slightly high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise67
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BigFix?
The most valuable features of the solution are Windows patching and the hardware and software inventory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?
The pricing is pretty good and now follows a subscription model similar to other major software solutions, making it easier for customers to subscribe and unsubscribe.
What needs improvement with BigFix?
I have concerns about BigFix's pricing, which I find to be slightly on the higher side. While it may not be the most affordable or competitive option, there is room for improvement. Additional feat...
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
Reporting ( /categories/reporting ) needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth. Another area that needs enhancement is the integration with proxies, as better integration would be ben...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management ( /products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management-reviews ) is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and...
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Endpoint Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation
1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Aconex 4. Adidas 5. AIG 6. Airbus 7. Akamai 8. Alibaba 9. Allianz 10. Amazon 11. American Express 12. Aon 13. Apple 14. ATT 15. Autodesk 16. Aviva 17. Bank of America 18. Barclays 19. Bayer 20. Bechtel 21. BlackRock 22. Boeing 23. BNP Paribas 24. Cisco 25. CocaCola 26. Comcast 27. Credit Suisse 28.Cushman Wakefield 29. Dell 30. Deutsche Bank 31. eBay
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Vicarius and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.