We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the fact that you can set alerts on the predicted cost in Azure Cost Management."
"My organization benefits from the tool's performance and time-saving features."
"The cost analysis and exportability are the most valuable features of the solution."
"During the two years I've been working with this solution, it has only been down once or twice. Thus, I would rate the stability of the solution at nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Cost Management is cost optimization."
"The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."
"The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."
"The resource forecasting feature is invaluable. Secondly, the ability to drill down to the regional and resource level is incredibly helpful for pinpointing where my costs are accruing."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"Azure Cost Management is expensive."
"There are significant issues with Power BI integration at the moment, particularly with built-in applications for course management. Multiple features don't allow for efficient report generation. This is one primary concern. The second issue relates to reporting, even when using Power BI templates for course management. There are problems with data import that require manual entry. So, these are the two main challenges I'm currently facing. Another matter to consider is the removal of the markup option for partners. I'm not sure if it will be added back, but it used to allow marking up Azure usage for enterprise customers. I'm uncertain if there's an alternative way to achieve the same function. Partners need to mark up services when selling to customers, and it's currently unavailable for some products or services."
"The technical support could be improved."
"If it worked better with other cloud providers it would be better."
"We lack a resource and ID login."
"It can be difficult to determine the cost associated with certain resources as it relies on a tagging progress. This means we need to drill down billing reports to highlight and fix missing tags."
"Optimization and scalability could be increased."
"I would like to see some features included for costing and more information about the components of deployment. Sometimes, it's very difficult to match the component with the solution because the descriptions are not very clear."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 11th in Cloud Cost Management with 2 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, Cloudability and Zabbix, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Azure Cost Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
