Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr comparison

Microsoft and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 3.4% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

Azure Cost Management

Read 46 Azure Cost Management reviews

1,549 Views
1,301 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 11 CloudCheckr reviews

1,513 Views
726 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Azure Cost Management

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Azure Cost Management and CloudCheckr both compete in the cloud cost optimization category. While Azure Cost Management is tightly integrated with the Azure ecosystem, CloudCheckr is preferred for its multi-cloud capabilities and extensive reporting tools.

Features: Azure Cost Management offers native integration with predictive cost analysis, budget alerts, and real-time consumption insights, and it is free for Azure subscribers with a comprehensive dashboard for cost management. CloudCheckr features extensive granular reporting, ease of use across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, providing detailed analysis and compliance checks.

Room for Improvement: Azure Cost Management can improve in areas such as self-healing capabilities, better multi-cloud integration, and automated reporting. CloudCheckr users seek better integration with Azure and Google Cloud, faster large data processing, and enhanced security compliance reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Cost Management is easily deployed within Azure environments with generally effective support, though response times vary. CloudCheckr supports public clouds with comprehensive documentation, though its integration with Azure and GCP could be smoother.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Cost Management is cost-effective as it's free for Azure users, aiding in expenditure reduction and offering positive ROI. CloudCheckr requires usage-based licensing, offering significant ROI through multi-cloud expense visibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Cost Management

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (22nd), Managed Cloud Services (4th), AI Observability (76th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Azure Cost Management is 3.4%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.9%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Cost Management	3.4%
CloudCheckr	2.9%
Other	93.7%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2702517

Senior Database / Data Management Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Transparency in cost estimation and budget maintenance is enhanced

At the beginning of the project, I estimate the cost and try to be transparent with the customer, letting them know the expected cost with a tolerance of plus or minus ten percent. If the requirement is clear, I estimate it for fifty to one hundred percent depending on their requirements. Any…

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft's technical support is good."

"The features that I have found most valuable, are the trend analysis and the budgetary trigger."

"The most valuable feature is that our customers can see their consumption in real time. Even though we have a couple of analytics provided by our company, those are not in real time."

"It encompasses a multitude of specialized services, each with its associated costs and considerations."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"I recommend it because it helps forecast and maintain the expected budget, setting clear expectations for the customer which is very important."

"The most valuable aspect of Azure Cost Management for me is the cost-saving recommendations based on our usage patterns."

"Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions."

More Azure Cost Management pros

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

More CloudCheckr pros

Cons

"The UI is complex, and it should be less so."

"Improved integration with other solutions could definitely be beneficial."

"The product's licensing cost could be improved."

"We would like to see more flexibility added to this solution, such as being able to compare reservations, or compare costs across multiple financial years and report on the reasons for deviation in spend."

"The affordability of licenses and subscription fees is a critical consideration, as not all companies can easily manage the cost of expensive licenses."

"The solution's technical support should be faster, more knowledgeable, and customer-friendly."

"The policy-based remediation is probably the biggest area where Azure is lacking and that's why we sell a lot of our technology to our customers."

"I would like to see some features included for costing and more information about the components of deployment. Sometimes, it's very difficult to match the component with the solution because the descriptions are not very clear."

More Azure Cost Management cons

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"I was not satisfied with the customer support from CloudCheckr."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

More CloudCheckr cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are monthly."

"The subscription fees are primarily tailored to larger enterprises, potentially leaving smaller and medium-sized customers with limited options."

"Compared to competitors, it's cost-effective. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better."

"Pricing isn't applicable as it's included with the subscription. It depends on the services used. If you acquire any services on Azure, you pay for the subscription, and the billing or cost management is included for free."

"I think the solution was free initially."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive either."

"Azure Cost Management is a free solution. The cost is only for Azure cloud."

More Azure Cost Management pricing and cost advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Cost Management?

Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Cost Management?

The pricing part could be improved. I would rate it as six out of ten. It depends on the solution. We mostly pay for our licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Cost Management?

There are areas in Azure Cost Management that could be improved; sometimes, as a start user or junior developer, if I try to understand which service consumed how much cost and look at different ch...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The pricing and licensing are quite convenient. I am not certain about the exact costs involved because another team handles that aspect. Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI. Some features may be too advanced and may have a learning curve, potentially lacking customization. Overall, CloudCheckr ...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 16% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Savings Plans vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Cost Management Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr

Compared 5% of the time

CloudStack vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management

January 2026

Download Azure Cost Management product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

January 2026

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Azure Cost Management provides tools for effective cost control, analysis, and expenditure tracking in cloud environments. It helps organizations optimize their cloud spending, offering insights and analytics for informed financial decision-making.

Azure Cost Management offers an integrated interface with features including real-time consumption display, cost analysis, and budgeting tools. Its predictive analytics and central visibility aid in monitoring resource costs and optimizing expenses. While companies endorse its intuitive integration and user-friendly approach, they seek improvements in automation, scalability, and connections to other cloud providers. Users value the platform for its capability to efficiently track spending, set alerts, and forecast costs, assisting in identifying and addressing cost drivers.

What are the key features of Azure Cost Management?

Advisor Recommendations: Offers suggestions for maintaining a clean environment and cost savings.
Intuitive Integration: Seamlessly integrates extra functions for enhanced management.
Real-Time Consumption: Displays immediate visibility into resource usage.
Predictive Analytics: Provides forecasts for better financial planning.
Budgeting Tools: Empowers users with tools for budget setting and alerts.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies tracking and management of expenditures.
Cost Efficiency: Enhances ability to identify and execute cost-saving strategies.
Informed Decision-Making: Supports strategic planning through accurate analytics.
Customization: Offers tailored features to meet unique financial planning needs.

In industries such as finance and IT, Azure Cost Management enables detailed budget control and expenditure tracking, helping organizations assess spending and optimize resource utilization. By analyzing monthly and yearly costs, they adjust budgets and develop strategies to improve financial performance.

Microsoft

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.