Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr comparison

Microsoft and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Spot is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 7.2% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

Azure Cost Management

Read 45 Azure Cost Management reviews

1,085 Views
357 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

512 Views
187 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Azure Cost Management

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Azure Cost Management and CloudCheckr both compete in the cloud cost optimization category. While Azure Cost Management is tightly integrated with the Azure ecosystem, CloudCheckr is preferred for its multi-cloud capabilities and extensive reporting tools.

Features: Azure Cost Management offers native integration with predictive cost analysis, budget alerts, and real-time consumption insights, and it is free for Azure subscribers with a comprehensive dashboard for cost management. CloudCheckr features extensive granular reporting, ease of use across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, providing detailed analysis and compliance checks.

Room for Improvement: Azure Cost Management can improve in areas such as self-healing capabilities, better multi-cloud integration, and automated reporting. CloudCheckr users seek better integration with Azure and Google Cloud, faster large data processing, and enhanced security compliance reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Cost Management is easily deployed within Azure environments with generally effective support, though response times vary. CloudCheckr supports public clouds with comprehensive documentation, though its integration with Azure and GCP could be smoother.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Cost Management is cost-effective as it's free for Azure users, aiding in expenditure reduction and offering positive ROI. CloudCheckr requires usage-based licensing, offering significant ROI through multi-cloud expense visibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Cost Management

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (29th), Managed Cloud Services (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Azure Cost Management is 7.2%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 4.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Joy Maitra

Sr. Technical Architect at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Continuous monitoring and predictive analytics help provide insights into utilization

Continuous monitoring helps me detect anomalies in the pipeline, preplan resource scalability, and assist with cost management by offering good visibility into resource utilization. It also offers predictive analytics and some existing features, including dashboards. The AI prediction feature helps forecast based on current utilization trends and suggests improvements like the GenAI feature for interactive inquiries.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it helps us to better forecast and reduce costs."

"We use the solution as a cost management tool to control the budget. It is easy to mange costs with the product."

"The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."

"Our customers use it and like it."

"We find the analytics available via this solution to be very useful, as it allows us to easily see detailed cost information for each of our various subscription elements."

"The advisor recommendations feature is the most valuable feature. It helps set your environment in a clean state."

"It has predictive analysis. It can forecast based on the costs associated with the particular architecture and how often they use it, estimating how much they'll spend."

"I recommend it because it helps forecast and maintain the expected budget, setting clear expectations for the customer which is very important."

More Azure Cost Management pros

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

Cons

"The technical support could be improved."

"It can be difficult to determine the cost associated with certain resources as it relies on a tagging progress. This means we need to drill down billing reports to highlight and fix missing tags."

"If it worked better with other cloud providers it would be better."

"The forecasting model can improve Azure Cost Management."

"The product's licensing cost could be improved."

"The dashboard could be improved."

"There are significant issues with Power BI integration at the moment, particularly with built-in applications for course management. Multiple features don't allow for efficient report generation. This is one primary concern. The second issue relates to reporting, even when using Power BI templates for course management. There are problems with data import that require manual entry. So, these are the two main challenges I'm currently facing. Another matter to consider is the removal of the markup option for partners. I'm not sure if it will be added back, but it used to allow marking up Azure usage for enterprise customers. I'm uncertain if there's an alternative way to achieve the same function. Partners need to mark up services when selling to customers, and it's currently unavailable for some products or services."

"Azure Cost Management is a little complicated, and the learning curve is somewhat steep."

More Azure Cost Management cons

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing isn't applicable as it's included with the subscription. It depends on the services used. If you acquire any services on Azure, you pay for the subscription, and the billing or cost management is included for free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Customers do not need to pay for the product's license, and the product is free of cost."

"You are charged based on how much you use the solution."

"Azure Cost Management is a free cost management tool."

"The tool's licensing costs are monthly."

"It's free out of the box."

"The tool's pricing is yearly."

More Azure Cost Management pricing and cost advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Cost Management?

Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Cost Management?

The pricing part could be improved. I would rate it as six out of ten. It depends on the solution. We mostly pay for our licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Cost Management?

Customization features could be added for Azure Cost Management ( /products/azure-cost-management-reviews ), but the dashboards are handy, and overall, everything is good.

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 41% of the time

Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 22% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Azure Cost Management Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

CloudStack vs CloudCheckr

Compared 9% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management

June 2025

Download Azure Cost Management product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Azure Cost Management provides actionable insights for IT professionals to optimize cloud expenses and align budgets with strategic goals. It features real-time visibility and analytics for efficient resource management.

Azure Cost Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools for cost analysis and control, including budgeting alerts and integration capabilities to optimize resource spending. Its intuitive interface simplifies navigation while providing trend analysis, forecasting, and cost-saving recommendations. By delivering detailed insights into resource usage, Azure helps organizations manage expenses effectively, enabling strategic financial planning through clear visualizations and reports.

What are the key features of Azure Cost Management?

Customizable Cost Analysis: Tailored insights to analyze expenses effectively.
Real-Time Consumption Visibility: Immediate data access for informed decision-making.
Budgeting Alerts: Set alerts to monitor and control spending.
Advisor Recommendations: Integrated advice for cost optimization.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with various platforms.
Trend Analysis and Forecasting: Tools to predict future costs and trends.

What benefits should be expected when using Azure Cost Management?

Expense Optimization: Streamlined processes for managing cloud costs.
Enhanced Budget Management: Precise control over budget allocations.
Improved Financial Insights: Clear reporting for better financial planning.
Strategic Resource Allocation: Insights for aligning resources with business goals.
Efficient Infrastructure Management: Support for cost management strategies across deployments.

Azure Cost Management is widely implemented in industries seeking to monitor and control budgets, optimize costs, and track resource spending. Companies utilize it to gain billing insights, understand usage patterns, and minimize cloud expenses. It is instrumental in managing infrastructure costs and supporting cost management strategies across different deployments, making it valuable for projecting profitability and setting cost alerts.

Microsoft

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.