Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr vs Cloudability comparison

Microsoft and Apptio are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apptio is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 6.8% mindshare in CCM, compared to Apptio’s 13.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Apptio users who would recommend it.

Azure Cost Management

Read 45 Azure Cost Management reviews

1,316 Views
1,013 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cloudability

Read 14 Cloudability reviews

1,627 Views
1,578 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

934 Views
523 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Azure Cost Management

Cloudability

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management, Cloudability, and CloudCheckr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,289 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Azure Cost Management is 6.8%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cloudability is 13.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 4.1%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Joy Maitra

Sr. Technical Architect at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Continuous monitoring and predictive analytics help provide insights into utilization

Continuous monitoring helps me detect anomalies in the pipeline, preplan resource scalability, and assist with cost management by offering good visibility into resource utilization. It also offers predictive analytics and some existing features, including dashboards. The AI prediction feature helps forecast based on current utilization trends and suggests improvements like the GenAI feature for interactive inquiries.

Read full review

Vijay More

Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Helps to understand and manage spending across clouds, but has dashboard limitations

Cloudability offers valuable insights into data engineering and analytics platforms. With access to the same data Cloudability utilizes, one could recreate similar dashboards on their own data platform. This implies that Cloudability's role could be replaceable with some organizational effort, provided they have the necessary data sources and expertise. However, for organizations looking to streamline processes without investing extensive time, money, and resources into building their solution, Cloudability serves as a convenient option. Moreover, it offers benefits for both single-cloud and multi-cloud users. While it's beneficial for single-cloud users, it becomes particularly advantageous for organizations with multi-cloud environments, as it helps manage costs and optimize resources across different cloud providers.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about Azure Cost Management is the cost analysis functionality because it provides regular alerts."

"Microsoft Azure Cloud Cost Management is easy to use and we have a lot of insights about all of our goals."

"The solution helps us diagnose and understand why some resources cost more so that we can fine-tune and reduce the cost."

"We find the analytics available via this solution to be very useful, as it allows us to easily see detailed cost information for each of our various subscription elements."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"The features that I have found most valuable, are the trend analysis and the budgetary trigger."

"The product provides visibility into what we are consuming."

"We don't actually use the Azure Cost Management features. We have our own capabilities. We put our own technology on top of Azure as Azure doesn't deliver a really good cost optimization, so our customers come to us to enhance what they're potentially doing inside their Azure platform."

More Azure Cost Management pros

"The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Cloudability's integration with our existing cloud infrastructure, it's not integrated directly into our AWS infrastructure but rather reads and pulls data from it, providing valuable insights and analysis for cost management."

"All the tagging and mapping, which helps to create some virtual tags are useful features."

"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."

"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."

"Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."

"The pricing isn't too expensive."

"Transparency and visibility are the key features."

"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."

More Cloudability pros

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

Cons

"There are certainly areas for improvement in terms of labeling the inventory. That's because right now, we use a number of services. But it's difficult when you look at the billing limiters and how they are named. We can't correlate those names to the actual services there. So, I can't click on an item and see if I'm still using this service or not. So it just rolls up and gives me values and figures, but I can't really correlate them to actual services on the Azure platform."

"If it worked better with other cloud providers it would be better."

"The solution's technical support should be faster, more knowledgeable, and customer-friendly."

"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."

"I would like to have added to Azure Cost Management, drill down features from within the cost analysis reporting."

"The forecasting model can improve Azure Cost Management."

"Azure Cost Management should be made cheaper."

"All the offers should be on the console. You shouldn't need to select from different tabs."

More Azure Cost Management cons

"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."

"We have dealt with a few technical support people where we ask for one thing and they might not deliver straightaway. It seems like they are a stretched across multiple customers."

"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."

"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."

"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."

"Right now, what we're doing is we are manually putting the data in it, which is something which we don't like about Cloudability."

"They can improve the custom range of the network."

"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."

More Cloudability cons

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You are charged based on how much you use the solution."

"I give the solution's overall cost an eight out of ten."

"It's free out of the box."

"Pricing isn't applicable as it's included with the subscription. It depends on the services used. If you acquire any services on Azure, you pay for the subscription, and the billing or cost management is included for free."

"The tool's pricing is yearly."

"Azure Cost Management is a free cost management tool."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive either."

"The tool's licensing costs are monthly."

More Azure Cost Management pricing and cost advice

"It justifies the cost and is worth it."

"Cloudability is a bit expensive."

"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."

"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."

"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Cost Management?

Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Cost Management?

The pricing part could be improved. I would rate it as six out of ten. It depends on the solution. We mostly pay for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Cost Management?

Customization features could be added for Azure Cost Management ( /products/azure-cost-management-reviews ), but the ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cloudability?

The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive. Pricing is one of th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudability?

The first one is, how to help users, especially practitioners, stick to their commitment plan. For example, how can I...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security comp...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 39% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs Azure Cost Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Cost Management Competitors

Apptio One vs Cloudability

Compared 30% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudability

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs Cloudability

Compared 9% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability

Compared 8% of the time

More Cloudability Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 20% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr

Compared 9% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Cost Management

July 2025

Download Azure Cost Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability

July 2025

Download Cloudability product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

July 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Azure Cost Management provides actionable insights for IT professionals to optimize cloud expenses and align budgets with strategic goals. It features real-time visibility and analytics for efficient resource management.

Azure Cost Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools for cost analysis and control, including budgeting alerts and integration capabilities to optimize resource spending. Its intuitive interface simplifies navigation while providing trend analysis, forecasting, and cost-saving recommendations. By delivering detailed insights into resource usage, Azure helps organizations manage expenses effectively, enabling strategic financial planning through clear visualizations and reports.

What are the key features of Azure Cost Management?

Customizable Cost Analysis: Tailored insights to analyze expenses effectively.
Real-Time Consumption Visibility: Immediate data access for informed decision-making.
Budgeting Alerts: Set alerts to monitor and control spending.
Advisor Recommendations: Integrated advice for cost optimization.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with various platforms.
Trend Analysis and Forecasting: Tools to predict future costs and trends.

What benefits should be expected when using Azure Cost Management?

Expense Optimization: Streamlined processes for managing cloud costs.
Enhanced Budget Management: Precise control over budget allocations.
Improved Financial Insights: Clear reporting for better financial planning.
Strategic Resource Allocation: Insights for aligning resources with business goals.
Efficient Infrastructure Management: Support for cost management strategies across deployments.

Azure Cost Management is widely implemented in industries seeking to monitor and control budgets, optimize costs, and track resource spending. Companies utilize it to gain billing insights, understand usage patterns, and minimize cloud expenses. It is instrumental in managing infrastructure costs and supporting cost management strategies across different deployments, making it valuable for projecting profitability and setting cost alerts.

Microsoft

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.