Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Apptio and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Apptio is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while VMware is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Apptio holds a 13.6% mindshare in CCM, compared to VMware’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Apptio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Cloudability

Read 14 Cloudability reviews

1,599 Views
395 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,181 Views
488 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Cloudability

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Cloudability and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth compete in cloud financial management. Cloudability seems to have the upper hand with strong AWS integration and fast data retrieval capabilities, making it highly valued for personalized dashboards and detailed reporting.

Features: Cloudability offers a Reserved Instance Planner for AWS, sophisticated dashboards, and effective rightsizing recommendations, enhancing cloud financial management through strong AWS integration. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth excels in providing cloud visibility and transparency, supports multi-cloud environments, and offers robust cost optimization and forecasting tools.

Room for Improvement: Users of Cloudability seek simpler usage, expanded rightsizing models, longer data analysis windows, and better API documentation. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth needs to enhance SaaS integration, on-premise offerings, and provide deeper cloud resource insights for better automation and data representation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudability is primarily used in the Public Cloud and is known for helpful regular support, though some users report inconsistencies. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth supports both On-premises and Public Cloud. It provides a dedicated account manager but receives mixed feedback on technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudability's pricing is seen as high, especially for smaller clients, operating on usage-based yearly charges, yet it provides significant ROI through features like reserved instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's pricing is competitive and flexible, with subscription models offering substantial ROI for varying company sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudability

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Cloudability is 13.6%, up from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 5.7%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Vijay More

Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Helps to understand and manage spending across clouds, but has dashboard limitations

Cloudability offers valuable insights into data engineering and analytics platforms. With access to the same data Cloudability utilizes, one could recreate similar dashboards on their own data platform. This implies that Cloudability's role could be replaceable with some organizational effort, provided they have the necessary data sources and expertise. However, for organizations looking to streamline processes without investing extensive time, money, and resources into building their solution, Cloudability serves as a convenient option. Moreover, it offers benefits for both single-cloud and multi-cloud users. While it's beneficial for single-cloud users, it becomes particularly advantageous for organizations with multi-cloud environments, as it helps manage costs and optimize resources across different cloud providers.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."

"The support from IBM is fantastic"

"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."

"Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."

"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."

"The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."

"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."

More Cloudability pros

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."

"There is always room for improvement in education and training. We are not that mature in terms of our automation. It could help us identify where we could optimize in terms of build."

"I would like the API functionality to improve. The update time after uploading data could also be improved."

"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."

"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."

"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."

"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."

"Right now, what we're doing is we are manually putting the data in it, which is something which we don't like about Cloudability."

More Cloudability cons

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."

"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."

"Cloudability is a bit expensive."

"It justifies the cost and is worth it."

"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudability?

The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive. Pricing is one of the main issues we face. Cloudability is actually expensive, and it's quite diffic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudability?

The first one is, how to help users, especially practitioners, stick to their commitment plan. For example, how can I use Cloudability to help me optimize my selling plan and my residential plan? T...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudHealth?

The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

There could be flexibility in pricing for the product. They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size. It will help us get the right cost. Ad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

I rate VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apptio One vs Cloudability

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudability

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability

Compared 11% of the time

Harness vs Cloudability

Compared 10% of the time

Densify vs Cloudability

Compared 7% of the time

More Cloudability Competitors

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

Apptio One vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 6% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability

June 2025

Download Cloudability product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

May 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

No data available

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

VMware

Sample Customers

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Free Report: Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.