We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The scalability has been good."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the native backup capabilities."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"The storage backup is very efficient."
"This solution allows me to restore either the VM or the data, depending on what is needed."
"It's easy to deploy."
"This solution is easy to configure and restore. It is a Microsoft product so is easily compatible with other solutions."
"First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client. You can schedule it as you like. You can also control the bandwidth, so the backup will not utilize. The internet will depend on the bandwidth."
"I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
"I would like to see better integration with more products, and more services."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
"I can’t use the solution to restore another native cloud solution. Azure must add this new feature."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"They need to improve the frequency of the backup. You can only backup one to three times a day. It would be better to back up continuously throughout the day."
"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."
"We have a concern with the backup when were are working with VMs that are running in Barracuda Firewall because it usually fails."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
More StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Azure Backup is ranked 9th in Backup and Recovery with 51 reviews while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] writes "An expensive next-generation data recovery and backup software solution with poor data restoration". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.