Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Backup vs Veritas NetBackup comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas NetBackup
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
115
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 3.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas NetBackup is 3.7%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve cost savings and efficiency with high-level restore capabilities
I use Azure Backup mainly for backing up virtual machines The feature I find most effective in Azure Backup is the high-level restore. Additionally, it has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution. The area that I believe needs improvement in…
Wesam Qashou - PeerSpot reviewer
A mature backup solution, with many features, and great support
Veritas NetBackup is the first line of defense when disaster strikes. Before performing disaster recovery, we must have a good backup of our image that is also protected from ransomware. This way, we have a golden image that is resilient to ransomware attacks. We saw the benefits of Veritas NetBackup within the first three months.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy to schedule backups."
"The compression features save us money and speed up the backup and restore process."
"The solution helped us use R2 RBO to back up frequently."
"The tool has a lot of features."
"Azure Backup is very simple to use and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its simplicity."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the native backup capabilities."
"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."
"I like the cross-platform features."
"Unauthorized people cannot log in and execute commands."
"We believe that everything Veritas NetBackup offers, including backups, snapshots, deduplication, and replication, is valuable."
"The main features of this solution are deduplication, compression, ease of use, simplistic user interface, and compatibility with all the backup service systems."
"The most valuable feature is its stability."
"I like that it's enterprise-capable. It can handle multiple operating systems. It can handle multiple database types. It can handle a lot of different backup use cases. It's flexible."
"NetBackup is highly stable. We have more than 1,800 policies that run every day."
"The solution is easy to learn."
 

Cons

"The support for Office365 backup is atrocious and is something that has to be improved."
"My company faces a lot of difficulties in restoring any encrypted VM backup."
"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
"The area that I believe needs improvement in Azure Backup is the restoring time."
"We faced some issues synchronizing the information in Azure when the storage was changed."
"The length of time it takes to restore is our main source of frustration. It would be beneficial to shorten the time it takes."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"It's a little bit complex to manage."
"Technical support only gets back to us the following morning."
"Setup implementation."
"The solution could improve by having a feature to backup iSeries workloads."
"When the customer is using SaaS applications like Office 365, the integration falls short and needs to be improved."
"The only pain point we have with this solution is the cost. It's very expensive. In fact, it's so expensive we are looking for other platforms. We want to move away from it in order to save our organization costs."
"I think reporting can always be improved."
"The database integration could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."
"Azure Backup is a product that is priced at a cheap rate, and it is a great tool."
"The price is pretty good, maybe $30 for a machine, I can't complain."
"Considering the fact that our company's enterprise-sized customers use the solution, the product's price is fine and is not on the higher side of the spectrum."
"Azure Backup can be expensive if you are not vigilant about your storage steering."
"This is an expensive solution in the Bangladesh marketplace."
"Pay as you go is the pricing model."
"We have enterprise-level pricing. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"In terms of cost, it's not very good."
"Smaller virtualized environments will want to stick to a traditional licensing model if possible. It will likely be cheaper, but it is a pain to manage all the individual licenses for each client."
"Veritas NetBackup is more expensive than Cohesity and Rubrik, but it is comparable in price to Commvault, IBM, and Dell."
"Licensing fees are charged based on the number of CPU cores."
"Veritas NetBackup's pricing is a bit steep when compared to other tools. It is very costly, but service-wise and overall, the Veritas NetBackup is a good product."
"Annual licensing fee."
"The price is okay."
"Its price is quite reasonable. The cost depends on the depreciation and the volume. It also depends on the infrastructure. If your infrastructure increases, you would need some more licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?
Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...
What do you like most about Azure Backup?
Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?
Azure Backup is expensive relative to the value we get from it. I do not have specific details about the licensing cost as it falls under another department.
What is the best next generation backup tool?
Assuming you have an onprem ecosystem which runs the VMware, physical systems on Win, Linux and Unix and run both traditional DB's and nosql DB's like mongo, then Netbackup (NBU) will be the right ...
What do you like most about Veritas NetBackup?
The most valuable feature of cloud integration is the ability to send data outside of your location. This can be achieved by integrating cloud tier options or other object storage solutions.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas NetBackup?
The product is cost-effective, and I would rate its pricing as an eight out of ten. The pricing model is based on the amount of data transferred, making it manageable for us.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction
Beta Offshore
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. Veritas NetBackup and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.