We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and DX SaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"It is a stable platform."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"DX allows you to customize and gives you a high degree of control."
"It supports numerous platforms."
"Actionable insight is the most valuable feature."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"The solution must improve automation."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The ability to scale presents a challenge as the cost of handling vast amounts of data in the cloud must be taken into account."
"DX SaaS is a latecomer to the APM market. Some things that are straightforward in Dynatrace are complicated in DX. For example, upgrading the agents is a seamless process in Dynatrace, but it's a pain in DX SaaS. You should be able to upgrade in the Application Command Center. However, it is not working correctly."
"Old user interface and dashboards could be improved."
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while DX SaaS is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while DX SaaS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX SaaS writes "It's highly customizable but lacks many features of available in competing solutions". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas DX SaaS is most compared with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, Zabbix, Nagios XI and Dynatrace. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. DX SaaS report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.