We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."
"With the new feature CA Team Center is much easier to view the information of my user experience, with this unified vision, it was even practical for lay users to use the tool"
"The way these tools show the information is very useful. this is a tool that records information from Java and .NET applications, and obtain information about how many times an method has been call in a period of time (usually 30 sec), how many times respond in this span of time or is delayed or stall."
"CA APM is very scalable and used in a clustered environment because it supports more than its technical capacity."
"Product performance is awesome. It's covering all aspects of the application; good database metrics and internal application metrics. Just tons and tons of data."
"Attribute decoration is a unique and very powerful feature. We can add meaningful meta information based on our internal demand."
"Service maturity when you can retrieve the normal metrics for every major aspect of each module and delivering this info to the correct eyes."
"Command center is a new feature that provides agent maintenance and support without involving the application team. It saves lots of time for APM team."
"For me, the most valuable feature is being able to check memory patterns. We check them when we do load testing or soak testing to see if there are any memory leaks."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"It could be cheaper."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The tool must include AI features."
"The APM upgrade procedure is a bit complicated with compatibility issues which can emerge like between agents and EM/Collectors."
"You can sell licenses and install the full tool on service, you can show customers how to install, but how to use it and solve issues cannot be done without the experience."
"The upgrade was complex. The documentation could have been a little bit better, but other than that, it was okay."
"Needs the ability to dynamically create dashboards. Right now, we do custom dashboards. Everything is created manually."
"As applications move to the cloud, we need more cloud-based solutions from CA APM. This is currently unavailable."
"They can make it easier to configure."
"The area of improvement is related to the areas of application onboarding and instrumentation, where the product has certain shortcomings."
"Lacks some integration between all the tools."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
