"We like the performance of the product."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"There are many valuable features in New Relic APM. We developed some software applications and we are able to monitor the errors very easily. Their log security retention is very good."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"Deep Dive and Transaction Analysis Triage capability."
"The features that I find most valuable are related to network monitoring."
"Scalable, stable, and easy to deploy APM tool which effectively monitors code-level visibility."
"JVM memory monitoring and connection pool monitoring are valuable features."
"The most valuable features are the low overhead, the ability to monitor production on 24/7 principle, the ability to decrease time to discover the point of failure in the IT infrastructure or the application environment in a short period of time, reporting for analyzing the performance of the application for improving the code optimizing process."
"We are using the on-premise and cloud versions of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"I like that it gives you a wide range of data where you can see the application outage response from concurrent locations and the number of stalled jobs."
"Instana is very fast to implement and deploy because the dashboards are automated and don't need configuration."
"The detailing of our application behavior and user experience is most valuable. In case there is an issue, we typically use Instana to figure it out. We can drill down to the application and figure out what's going on and where the issue is."
"The overall capabilities are the most valuable."
"With Instana, the interface and the UI are very simple to use."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well. It is not able to record information with the application server. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. It should be a little bit easier and cheaper. Because it is pretty difficult and expensive, many customers don't take it."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
"It would be nice if there were pre-made dashboards."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"The technical support is very poor."
"Issue resolution needs to be faster, rather than having users wait for the next release for issues to be fixed."
"With respect to SQL monitoring, it would be nice to have a little more information because it doesn't provide the full statement all of the time."
"The stability could be more reliable."
"Support could be much better."
"Lacks some integration between all the tools."
"They can make it easier to configure."
"It doesn't have a proper database, and the configuration is very difficult."
"The integration could be improved with more plugins or open API."
"We should be able to go back to scenarios during or before the issue. There should be something like a history playback. Such a feature or functionality would be good."
"The configuration of Instana Dynamic APM needs improvement because it requires quite a bit of work."
"I think that Instana should improve the university and the certification process, so the users can find experts in Instana with their certification module process."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 11th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 12 reviews while Instana Dynamic APM is ranked 36th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 7.2, while Instana Dynamic APM is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Has high pricing, needs better stability and requires more reliable ML/AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Instana Dynamic APM writes "We can drill down and figure out what's going on with the application, but the API monitoring and user experience monitoring aspects could be better". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, BMC TrueSight Operations Management, Datadog and New Relic Browser, whereas Instana Dynamic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog, Elastic Observability and Azure Monitor. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Instana Dynamic APM report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
