We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring."It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"I like TIBCO's ability to create versioned queues and persistent messages."
"The Enterprise Messaging Server will store the message and wait for other subscribers to come onto the network."
"It allows us to achieve synchronous as well as asynchronous communication with the added advantage of making the communication reliable."
"The initial setup is straightforward and the product documentation is very good."
"The setup was done by TIBCO. It has been stable and has a server."
"It is very useful tool. It is also very easy to learn and implement."
"TIBCO Enterprise Message Service's most valuable features are rapid zero-code integration and its large number of adapters and plugins."
"We have implanted the core middleware solution for the organization using this product and it is responsible for communication between different applications."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"Since all the communications goes through this product, it acts as a single point of failure."
"TIBCO also has its proprietary line of cloud-based applications, but specifically, these two products are not cloud compatible."
"I would like to see better integration with Java and Apache Kafka."
"An area for improvement would be integration with the API layer."
"Overall, my experience with the support team has been disappointing."
More TIBCO Enterprise Message Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 6th in Business Activity Monitoring while TIBCO Enterprise Message Service is ranked 2nd in Business Activity Monitoring with 5 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while TIBCO Enterprise Message Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Enterprise Message Service writes "A value-for-money solution with the requisite features to facilitate efficient communication within an organization". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas TIBCO Enterprise Message Service is most compared with IBM MQ, TIBCO FTL, PubSub+ Event Broker, Amazon SNS and Amazon EventBridge.
See our list of best Business Activity Monitoring vendors and best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.