Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs IxChariot comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. Auvik is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #12. Auvik holds a 4.7% mindshare in NT, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,973 Views
1,897 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

IxChariot

Read 2 IxChariot reviews

965 Views
965 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

IxChariot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

Based on user reviews, Auvik generally surpasses IxChariot in network performance and management, with Auvik having the upper hand due to its broader feature set and ease of use.

Features: IxChariot offers strong network simulation, testing capabilities, and robust performance metrics. Auvik provides comprehensive network monitoring, automated management, and deeper insights into network performance. The wider range of features in Auvik makes it more appealing to users.

Room for Improvement: IxChariot could improve the intuitive setup process, enhance documentation, and simplify the user interface. Auvik could benefit from improved reporting capabilities, more flexible alert settings, and enhanced customization options. Users note fewer areas for improvement with Auvik.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IxChariot's deployment can be challenging due to its steeper learning curve, but its performance is highly rated once set up. Auvik is noted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service, contributing to a better overall user experience.

Pricing and ROI: IxChariot is seen as pricier with higher initial setup costs but offers strong long-term benefits for specific network testing needs. Auvik offers more competitive pricing and is viewed as providing better ROI due to its extensive feature set and ease of use. Users believe Auvik offers more value for the money.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,325 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

IxChariot

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 4.7%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IxChariot is 4.0%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	4.7%
IxChariot	4.0%
Other	91.3%

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Venkat Lkmula

Tech spesialist at INT tech services

A vast solution with user-friendly features and reasonable pricing

It is very scalable. You can easily increase the payers in the license activation. If you have any issues, the IxChariot host system can be rebooted. We currently have about 100 setups in our lab. Out of those 100 setups, around 90 are being used. So overall, 90% of the setups use a minimum of 10 paces where we test the range versus rate. In addition, we are building up several test bits, which will increase the usage. No maintenance is required for this solution unless the host system has a problem. Once IxChariot is installed, it automatically updates if you set it to auto-update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auvik automatically updates network topology. Since it automatically updates the topology, we proactively know what is happening in a country or our branch offices. It also alerts us if there is a topology change, e.g., if it discovers anything new in that country. So, it has reduced the number of failures in our operations. We went from being reactive to proactive. So, we are no longer reacting to what is happening and others are doing. This has saved us about two to three hours a day. We used to spend two to three hours every morning checking the firewall and router logs for malicious behavior."

"Automatic alerting is probably the most valuable."

"I like the ability to remotely access devices securely. The multi-site setup has also been useful. Once we learned how to set that up, we could customize each site and push out common information like SNMP credentials from the parent site to other multi-sites. The automatic network layout is excellent, and the overall monitoring is also beneficial."

"Auvik has decreased our mean time to resolution for the issues that it alerts us on."

"Overall, compared to everything else out there, it's a solid 10 out of 10."

"What I appreciate most about Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the alerting system."

"The quality and speed of Auvik's customer support were excellent."

"I like Auvik's alerts. We can configure the alerts for a specific timeframe, i.e., we can set it to alert us when devices have been offline for a specific amount of minutes. If a device or port is flapping, we can ignore it or allow only the first alert to come in and mute the subsequent alerts."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Active testing of network infrastructure with a central server and an easy-to-use GUI, automatic test endpoint registration, and predefined scenarios for real-world traffic including many VoIP types makes this solution very powerful for our environment."

"Implementing IxChariot is very easy and user-friendly."

Cons

"They can implement a more collective network mapping to help reduce any congestive features. When it came down to many of the companies we worked with, their networks were already pre-structured, so we didn't have as much congestion. Given the fact that I could see how that would be an issue, maybe there would be a better way they could collapse or compile the network mapping issues."

"When mapping complex network architectures or nonstandard things, the map doesn't always accurately reflect reality. Sometimes the interface is pretty sluggish. It's much worse if the customer environment is relatively large and complex. But even if you split a site that's large into a couple of multi-sites, The performance is still a bit slow sometimes."

"To improve customer onboarding, Auvik could consider offering a free tier of the product."

"The one thing that I need more help with is the networking of virtualization hosts. I need more information on those hosts and which virtual networks are attached to what, the virtual switches that are in there, and how they function. None of that exists currently."

"I'd like to see some enhancements to Auvik's network map, including the ability to focus on specific areas without viewing the entire map."

"There are spots in the interface that could use a little more work as it is congested with a lot of information in one spot."

"We have some clients that are rather large and the topology display can be a little bit of a mess. For smaller organizations, Auvik is perfect... But for some of our larger clients, the topology view is almost unusable."

"I would like firmware/software updates for hardware, for at least switches and routers. I already have the feature request in, and it is on their list of things to try and do. Cisco stuff has been notoriously and historically kind of a pain to do, and that is what we use primarily. So, that would be a wonderful thing to get, as it is a device-by-device process. It would be nice to be able to get through that at least in a less fiddly way. It is a pretty manual process now."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Automatization of multiple test scenarios is now only possible from the API."

"The graphical user interface needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Auvik is a good product for the price. The license is reasonable. We took a chance on it and figured it would work for us. It did even more than we expected."

"It seems that the pricing is a little higher than some of the other solutions, but it also offers more value and data."

"The price of Auvik is okay. It is appropriate for the market."

"I can't speak to the cost; I'm an engineer. Auvik has a subscription-based pricing option, and the other solution we evaluated had high upfront costs."

"They charge for switches and some networking hardware, but everything else is free."

"The pricing is fair; it's just the right price for what the solution provides."

"Auvik tends to be on the pricier side."

"I don't know how much the solution costs, but the fact that we've moved almost all of our customers over to it means it must be worth the value. Our platforms are costly, but we switched to Auvik, so the company must see it as cost-effective."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

University

11%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Wireshark vs IxChariot

Compared 33% of the time

Observer GigaStor vs IxChariot

Compared 18% of the time

LinkRunner vs IxChariot

Compared 15% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs IxChariot

Compared 9% of the time

More IxChariot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Troubleshooting

September 2026

Download IxChariot product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

IxChariot provides an efficient network performance testing solution, enabling users to quickly assess, troubleshoot, and optimize network applications. It is recognized for delivering accurate, real-time analytics, crucial for IT professionals maintaining robust network environments.

IxChariot is a leading tool for simulating real-world app conditions across a network, offering invaluable insight into performance metrics. Designed for IT teams seeking to enhance their capabilities, it enables users to evaluate complex network scenarios, ensuring high performance and reliability. Its ability to test various scales and types of network configurations makes it an essential resource for businesses aiming to improve their digital infrastructure. Users often find it integral for comprehensive network analysis.

What are the key features of IxChariot?

Real-world Traffic Simulation: Tests with simulated traffic to mimic actual network conditions.
Scalability: Capable of handling extensive network configurations and scenarios.
Comprehensive Metrics: Provides in-depth performance data for thorough analysis.
Customizable Testing: Users can create tailored test scripts for specific scenarios.
Automation Support: Facilitates integration into automated testing workflows.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in IxChariot reviews?

Reliable Performance Insights: Ensures accurate data for performance optimization.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines testing and troubleshooting, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Troubleshooting: Quickly identifies and resolves network issues.
Improved Network Planning: Aids in proactive infrastructure development and scaling.

Industries such as telecommunications, financial services, and e-commerce implement IxChariot to ensure optimal network performance under varied conditions. For telecoms, it tests bandwidth and latency management. Financial services use it for secure, high-speed transaction processing, while e-commerce platforms leverage its capabilities for smooth user experience during peak loads.

Keysight Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IxChariot report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.