We performed a comparison between Atlassian Crowd and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient."
"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"If you want some other FortiAuthenticator from one site to another site, you should have requirements, but really if you have authentication and directory or another solution, you should change the password of the authenticator between the solution and the directory and other things. So transfer of data and other information should be simpler."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services"
"FortiAuthenticator's interface could be better."
"I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification."
Atlassian Crowd is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. Atlassian Crowd is rated 9.2, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atlassian Crowd writes "Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". Atlassian Crowd is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo. See our Atlassian Crowd vs. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.