Atlassian Crowd vs OneLogin by One Identity comparison

Atlassian and One Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Atlassian is ranked #26, while One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Atlassian holds a 1.5% mindshare in SSO, compared to One Identity’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Atlassian Crowd

Read 4 Atlassian Crowd reviews

1,055 Views
960 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin by One Identity

Read 99 OneLogin by One Identity reviews

10,342 Views
4,964 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Atlassian Crowd

OneLogin by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Atlassian Crowd and OneLogin are competitive products in the identity and access management arena. OneLogin stands out for its robust feature set, while Atlassian Crowd is often preferred due to its pricing and support advantages.

Features: Atlassian Crowd provides seamless integration with Atlassian tools, efficient directory management, and supports multiple third-party directories like OpenLDAP and Active Directory. OneLogin offers advanced features like multi-factor authentication, comprehensive single sign-on solutions, and adaptive authentication that assesses login risk in real-time.

Room for Improvement: Atlassian Crowd could enhance its feature offerings beyond Atlassian product integration, provide better documentation for third-party integrations, and expand its directory support options. OneLogin could improve by simplifying its deployment for non-cloud-savvy organizations, enhancing user interface intuitiveness, and optimizing its pricing structure for smaller companies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Atlassian Crowd is easily deployed, especially within existing Atlassian ecosystems, and offers reliable customer service. OneLogin's cloud-based deployment is efficient and supported by strong customer service, though newcomers to cloud solutions might encounter complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Atlassian Crowd is cost-effective, with lower initial costs appealing to smaller organizations. OneLogin, with higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI through advanced security and productivity features, making it more suitable for larger organizations ready to invest.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian Crowd

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

26th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneLogin by One Identity

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Atlassian Crowd is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneLogin by One Identity is 4.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	4.1%
Atlassian Crowd	1.5%
Other	94.4%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Grigoriy Kneller

General Manager at HDI Systeme AG

Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories

For organizations using various Atlassian products and dealing with multiple user sources or directories, implementing Atlassian Crowd for single sign-on proves highly beneficial. This is especially true for companies that have instances of Atlassian product installations across different entities, each with its own Active Directory and user directory. Crowd significantly streamlines user and directory management, making it more efficient for larger enterprises. It is particularly advisable and recommended for big companies, especially those that have undergone acquisitions or mergers, as it enhances user management, transparency, and configurability. While it's incredibly useful for enterprise-level businesses, it may also be suitable for mid-sized companies with a substantial user base. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."

"Integrating third-party directories is very easy since Crowd offers well-described input fields so you know what information is needed."

"If your budget allows, it is worth purchasing Crowd once you have at least 2 Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence."

"One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."

"Using OneLogin, I have noticed an increase in the security posture of my organization, enforcing MFA across VPN, firewall, and cloud apps while centralizing authentication."

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce issues and save time."

"OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface."

"OneLogin has highly impacted our organization positively because it provides full customized control of user access and multi-factor authentication with great supported methods such as SMS OTP or email OTP, which are the key positive things we are getting from this solution."

"The single sign-on and the fact that we can integrate everything in one place and control from there were valuable features of this solution."

"The solution helped save money for our organization, either by optimizing time-intensive processes or by increasing productivity."

"OneLogin has definitely saved a lot of time since we do not have to deal with multiple logins anymore."

More OneLogin by One Identity pros

Cons

"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."

"It would be great if the UI would receive a complete re-design."

"Exporting users/group toward LDAP and retrieving LDAP attributes like photo profile."

"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."

"There are a couple of areas for improvement in OneLogin. While it is strong overall, the key areas that could be worked on include the ease of configuration for advanced workflows, as setting up complex role-based policies or integration across different systems in the HealthTech market requires considerable technical effort."

"OneLogin could be improved with more add-ins for integration with Entra ID and Exchange Online."

"I believe support response time and troubleshooting for complex integrations could be improved in some cases for OneLogin."

"I'm a cybersecurity guy and I found that the two-factor authentication offering they have (if you don't buy one of their other products) is pretty basic."

"Based on my experience, improvements needed for OneLogin include better granular policy controls and more advanced analytics for authentication activity, which would be especially useful for larger enterprise environments."

"OneLogin by One Identity needs to upgrade or enhance areas such as complexity in custom Active Directory AD HR mapping and setter interface refresh."

"I believe the initial setup should be more straightforward."

"The pricing could be reduced to make OneLogin more effective."

More OneLogin by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's pretty cheap. I would rate the price as three out of five."

"While it may seem affordable for larger enterprises, it tends to become more expensive as you move up the scale."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

University

11%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	135
Midsize Enterprise	29
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

I think OneLogin could improve the learning curve for administrators and make the configuration more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin's main use case for my organization is unified authentication. I apply it for Single Sign-On management in my day-to-day work within the company. I have noticed that this tool especially m...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

I would advise other companies considering using OneLogin to compare prices with other tools before making a decision. I have given this review a rating of 8.

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs Atlassian Crowd

Compared 22% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Atlassian Crowd

Compared 22% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Atlassian Crowd

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Atlassian Crowd

Compared 7% of the time

LastPass Business vs Atlassian Crowd

Compared 5% of the time

More Atlassian Crowd Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Identity Manager by One Identity vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

July 2026

Download Atlassian Crowd product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity

July 2026

Download OneLogin by One Identity product report

Also Known As

Crowd

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

Atlassian Crowd is an identity management platform designed for businesses to streamline access and authentication processes across multiple web applications, enhancing security and improving operational efficiency.

Offering centralized user management, Atlassian Crowd enables organizations to simplify handling user identities and group memberships. It facilitates seamless integration with existing infrastructure to ensure a consistent experience across platforms. Supporting both on-premise and cloud applications, it is scalable to meet growing user demands. Businesses gain control over authentication, enabling flexibility in enforcing security policies while maintaining ease of access for users.

What are the standout features of Atlassian Crowd?

Single Sign-On (SSO): Provides centralized authentication for ease of use across integrated applications.
Directory Integration: Connects with multiple directories allowing synchronized user management.
Access Control: Defines user permissions ensuring secure access to resources.
Audit Logs: Monitors and records activities for compliance and security analysis.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors user and group management processes to fit specific requirements.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Atlassian Crowd?

Enhanced Security: By managing user identities, access is more secure and controlled.
Efficiency Gains: Reduces administrative tasks associated with user management and access control.
Cost Savings: Streamlined processes reduce time and labor costs related to identity management.
Scalability: Easily adapts to changes in organizational growth and application integration.

Industries such as finance and healthcare implement Atlassian Crowd to meet stringent regulatory requirements and secure sensitive data effectively. Tech companies leverage its scalability for dynamic project teams, ensuring efficient access control while fostering collaboration across departments.

Atlassian

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

NHL, Interspire, Appfire

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Buyer's Guide

Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity

June 2026

Free Report: Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlassian Crowd vs. OneLogin by One Identity report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.