Atera vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

Atera and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Atera is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. Atera holds a 3.7% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

1,312 Views
125 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

921 Views
225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Atera are both prominent patch management solutions, but they cater to slightly different needs. Based on the feature set and user feedback, Atera seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive IT management suite.

Features: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune provides integrative patching capabilities within Microsoft Intune's environment, supporting various third-party applications essential for security compliance. Atera offers a diverse set of features, including remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing systems aside from patching capabilities. Users appreciate Atera for its comprehensive IT management suite, whereas Ivanti is praised for its integration with existing Microsoft tools.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune could enhance its reporting capabilities and improve patch deployment accuracy. Atera users often mention the need for better customization in automation scripts and a more intuitive alert system. Atera's more diverse user requests indicate a broader usage scope and expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune benefits from seamless integration with Microsoft Intune, facilitating straightforward deployment for environments already utilizing Microsoft solutions. Customer service is reported as responsive and knowledgeable. Atera is praised for its ease of setup and the flexibility of its cloud-based model, allowing quick deployment across varied IT infrastructures. Atera's customer service is highlighted for its 24/7 availability but sometimes lagging in resolution times.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is noted for its cost-effectiveness if already using other Microsoft services, offering significant ROI through its integrated approach. Atera's pricing is generally perceived as higher but justified by its extensive feature set, which may lead to a higher ROI for businesses seeking an all-in-one IT management solution. Users show satisfaction with the value provided by both products relative to their respective costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (14th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th)

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Atera is 3.7%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 1.6%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

DddGgggg

Information Technology System Engineer at DRÄXLMAIER Group

Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches

We can set a maintenance window and push the patch. I prefer writing scripts, doing software deployment, pushing it, and distributing applications in servers for the corner of the whole location. We download patches from Ivanti, and it collaborates with more than 700 products. For third-party applications, we download the patches, set a role in our environment, and push it using the maintenance window time and activation date. For software deployment, we receive the service request to install and prepare scripts and then push it in many locations according and relevant to the service request for each location. The group or collection devices are affected by the policy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"There are a lot fewer hardware replacements. Once people migrated from old style hard disks over to SSDs, you have things like hard disks filling up faster. So, I run a script to clear out all the waste, e.g., all the temporary files and downloads. A lot of our business runs through a custom web application that we built. This involves people downloading a lot of PDFs and Excel files, and not just having them sitting in folders. With Atera, I can just go through and clean the temporary files out."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"I would say it's the number one tool for all ITMS."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

More Atera pros

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"We can set a maintenance window and push the patch."

"It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers. Increasingly, we need to be able to monitor and manage network devices. Atera is improving on that already, which is one place that it is currently lacking."

"It should improve its processes."

"There is definitely room for improvement with its automation capabilities."

"Customization could be improved."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

More Atera cons

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

"I would like to have better support for the application."

"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"Atera's pricing stays fixed and predictable, enabling us to add more customers and unlimited monitored devices. We still have a number of clients who fit a break/fix IT model. This is something where clients are complaining more about having to pay extra month-by-month for technology services. With Atera's model, we don't have to be going out and asking for more from clients each month. Right now, with where we are at in terms of scale, this is very important to us."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"The solution is affordable."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Retailer

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Windows?

We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 23% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 15% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 38% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 25% of the time

Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 21% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 15% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

June 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

June 2025

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

June 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.