Find out what your peers are saying about Radware, NETSCOUT, Cloudflare and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection.
For the small project I was working on, using the basic tier provided a huge improvement at zero cost.
In terms of return on investment with Cloudflare, it costs my time to set them up, but basically once they're set up, it's done.
The return on investment for me is significant as time is the critical aspect.
The service generates a low rate of false positives, reducing the overhead of managing false positive events.
Cloudflare does not offer hands-on technical support to fix customer problems but rather a self-service model.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to call them.
We use other solutions where support is available through Slack channels and is more interactive, with someone responding within a couple of minutes or seconds.
The technical support team is very effective in resolving issues.
Although the team is good, they are not fast, and they lack the skills to manage dynamic attackers.
Support for Arbor DDoS deserves a rating of 10 because when there is a problem with implementation, the people I work with are the best.
There is a lack of SLA adherence, and third-party partners do not provide prompt responses.
We have had some open tickets for months, maybe half a year, and there is no real answer.
The service response times are aligned with standards, responding within a few hours based on the problem's criticality.
It is a SaaS tool, but the fact that they have workloads deployed across the world proves that it is a highly scalable tool.
The tool offers very good performance, even during high-traffic periods.
Cloudflare's scalability is quite good; it is very easy to scale whenever we want to include multiple domains.
This would enhance the knowledge about scalability options available for Arbor DDoS, making it more accessible and useful for users.
They need to purchase boxes monthly to expand their bandwidths, and these new boxes can be added to the installed base very easily.
I find Arbor DDoS to be very scalable.
Wildfire is highly scalable.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is scalable, and I give it a nine for scalability.
The on-premises version is expensive to scale as it might need an additional device to be installed in the setup.
The service is very stable with no impacts during high-traffic periods.
Cloudflare's reliability and uptime has met my expectations; it has been quite good in general.
It is a very stable product.
Arbor DDoS is very stable.
It performs filtering, malware blocking, and scanning.
The solution is scalable and stable.
Customers do not have options to modify any configuration parameters in Cloudflare, whereas other competitor solutions, such as F5 Distributed Cloud, allow customers to tune configurations according to their requirements.
There are some performance considerations when it comes to dynamic content that involves fetching data from databases or using APIs.
What Cloudflare is doing internally is that it is stepping ahead in areas like detection and protection.
I would like to see an option to decrypt the traffic with Arbor DDoS, as some clients are interested in this, particularly for application layer attacks on port 443.
Enhancing the handshakes between Arbor DDoS and third-party solutions is essential for obtaining better and real-time data that supports any organization’s support team effectively.
I would like to see a roadmap for one or two years, and it is tough to predict what will happen in that timeframe without a clearer description.
It should be easier to establish the Palo Alto Networks WildFire cluster between the devices.
The dashboard should provide better visibility, especially in showing how many files are sent to Wildfire and their findings.
It is a very good product.
I find it to be cheap.
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
The tool is a premium product, so it is very expensive.
The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive.
For some customers, the cost is expensive, but for enterprises looking to protect their services, it is affordable.
I would rate it an eight out of ten in terms of affordability.
Techniques like minification and image compression reduce the size of assets, leading to better performance and faster user load times.
The solution has been able to compare it to the market, and I think the product has taken great strides in automating quite a bit of things, and they use a lot of AI.
Most of our DNS records that are presented to the internet are proxied whenever possible, providing another layer of defense from our perspective.
That is an attack over 10 gigabit per second, and if an attack enters the telecommunication network, that will be a disaster for their customer, their services, and so on.
We have many updates for the library of different attacks, and they have artificial intelligence that automatically learns the process during different attacks.
You can generate flow spec filters. These filters are transferred through BGP to border routers, which automatically build filters, mitigating the attack even at the network's boundary and preventing it from reaching the TMS.
Integrating Palo Alto Networks WildFire with various security protocols similar to a firewall has significantly improved the overall threat detection capabilities in our organization.
The most valuable feature of Wildfire is its sandboxing capability for examining suspicious files or locations.
The integration and working with third-party solutions was very seamless and smooth.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Arbor DDoS | 7.8% |
| Cloudflare | 14.9% |
| Imperva Application Security Platform | 8.3% |
| Other | 69.0% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks WildFire | 7.5% |
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | 6.9% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 5.4% |
| Other | 80.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Cloudflare enhances web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DDoS mitigation while providing easy DNS management and intuitive setup through its user-friendly dashboard.
Cloudflare is recognized for its comprehensive web security and performance solutions. Speed improvements are achieved through caching mechanisms and DDoS protection, combining ease of DNS management with flexible page rules. The robust analytics and threat insight tools provide valuable data, assisted by a user-friendly dashboard allowing quick setup and configuration. An API offers dynamic DNS settings ensuring low latency and high performance across the globe.
What are Cloudflare's key features?Cloudflare finds utility across industries for DNS management and defense mechanisms. Its content delivery network assures fast content distribution and fortified security. Businesses integrate features like web application firewalls, load balancing, end-to-end SSL, and zero trust to protect websites from cyber threats while ensuring resilience and reliable performance.
Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.
Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.
What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire provides robust threat prevention with emphasis on automated malware detection and real-time security updates. Seamless integration and intuitive deployment enhance its ability to protect environments effectively, addressing advanced threat scenarios.
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is recognized for its threat detection capabilities, offering automated analysis of emails and effective malware response. The integration with Palo Alto's ecosystem ensures users benefit from seamless operations while safeguarding on-premise and cloud infrastructures. It supports VPN, URL filtering, and user identification with a focus on reducing manual intervention. Users note its complexity and high pricing but appreciate the efficient deployment once configured. Integration with third-party systems requires attention, but it remains vital for those requiring advanced network security measures.
What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks WildFire?Industries like banking leverage Palo Alto Networks WildFire for securing infrastructure against zero-day threats and cyber-attacks. It is widely used for scanning files and emails, ensuring malicious activity is prevented. Integrated with firewalls, WildFire strengthens cybersecurity frameworks, protecting organizations from evolving security challenges.
We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.