We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Fortinet FortiDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is okay and we have not encountered problems with the solution."
"Companies that live from their presence on the internet will get a very high return on investment from Arbor."
"Arbor DDoS's best feature is that we can put the certificates in, and it will look at layer seven and the encrypted traffic and do the required signaling."
"The artificial intelligence feature is most appreciated. This solution can lower the throughput and clear the traffic, which is something really important for us. It also provides good protection. It is user-friendly, and its integration has also been really fast. We have many critical applications, and it was easy to integrate Arbor DDoS with our website, mobile application, and web banking."
"Arbor DDoS is easy to use, provides effective blocking of DDoS attacks, and can be used for DNS, web, and main servers. Additionally, this solution is far easier to operate than others solutions, such as Fortinet DDoS."
"Arbor DDoS offers security features that automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks."
"The technical support of Arbor DDoS is good."
"The most valuable feature is mitigation, which can blackhole the IP."
"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."
"The customer support is helpful."
"We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."
"They should improve the reporting section and make it a little bit more detailed. I would like to have much better and more detailed reports."
"The regional support here in African could improve, such as marketing and account managers."
"The solution's IT support needs improvement."
"Arbor's SSL decryption is confusing and needs external cards to be installed in the devices. This is not the best solution from an architectural point of view for protecting HTTPS and every other protocol that is SSL encrypted."
"An improvement would be to provide information on how pricing is done on different customer levels."
"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."
"Arbor DDoS could improve out-of-the-box reporting, it could be better."
"An issue which needs to be addressed concerns information I received of attacks on the radar and Arbor, allegedly, not taking any action."
"There aren't really any aspects of the solution we are unhappy with. It's been a positive experience overall."
"The only thing they need to do is to automate it. Today, you must create tools that do not require the use of an expert or anyone with special skills."
"The OS could be less buggy."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 3rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews while Fortinet FortiDDoS is ranked 14th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 3 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.8, while Fortinet FortiDDoS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "Best DDoS protection and offers affordable boxes for all types of clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiDDoS writes "Well suited for small businesses, but the setup is complex". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Radware DefensePro, Corero, A10 Thunder TPS and Azure DDoS Protection, whereas Fortinet FortiDDoS is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, VMware NSX, Azure DDoS Protection, Cloudflare and Radware DefensePro. See our Arbor DDoS vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.