Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,253 views|7,505 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,546 views|1,207 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Google Logo
5,702 views|5,175 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS, Google Cloud Spanner, and Google Cloud SQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.""Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality.""The solution’s scalability, usability, and availability are valuable to us.""Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing.""The IT is easy to set up, which is the best.""I recommend RDS because it makes your life super easy.""It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy.""Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically.""We can scale the solution if we need to.""Google Cloud Spanner is stable.""The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

More Google Cloud Spanner Pros →

"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications.""This is a stable solution and offers good performance.""Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL.""The initial setup is straightforward.""Its most valuable feature is that it's scalable. I can start off with a base of a lot of data and move as much as I want and it's the same as if asked to do a lot of infrastructure changes.""I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect.""The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly.""It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."

More Google Cloud SQL Pros →

Cons
"With my limited experience, I have noticed that documentation management could be improved. It could be better.""The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI.""One of the challenges of AWS RDS is that it doesn't support performance insight. So we need to write our own script or use third-party tools.""I also don't think it's very scalable.""I like using Amazon RDS because it offers quick operations for me. However, there are times when understanding how to use some of the services can be challenging, even with documentation. If I could add a feature, I'd improve navigation for related services.""Some of the features will not be there. For example, some on-premises things we want to set up will not be supported there. There are some challenges that they are fixing.""Sometimes the interface has many moving parts, which is a concern.""It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with Microsoft products. Our clients use the Microsoft Tally application server. We already tried to create a reputation from, for example, an on-premises environment from our client to Amazon RDS using Microsoft Tally server, and we couldn't do that because we didn't have a strong user in RDS. We couldn't create a reputation from an on-premises environment from the Microsoft Tally server to RDS. I think that it would be a good implementation, and it would help us with this case."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"The cost can be a bit high.""I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure.""The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling.""Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine."

More Google Cloud Spanner Cons →

"I am yet to explore a lot of features that are present in this solution. However, it would be good if more documentation is available for this solution. This would help us in preparing for the certification exam and understand it better. Currently, we don't have much documentation. We do the labs for 20 or 25 minutes, but we can't capture and download anything.""In the case of Google, they need to work on a more easy interface for users.""The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address.""To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release.""I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption.""The monitoring part could be better.""The purging of the data could be better.""It is hard to do logging with the solution."

More Google Cloud SQL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Spanner Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."
  • "It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."
  • "From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."
  • "You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."
  • More Google Cloud SQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID… more »
    Top Answer:The implementation part of the product was easy.
    Top Answer:It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time.
    Top Answer:The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,253
    Comparisons
    7,505
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    8th
    Views
    1,546
    Comparisons
    1,207
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    9.0
    5th
    Views
    5,702
    Comparisons
    5,175
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    414
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Google Spanner
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

    Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.
    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel
    BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Retailer9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.