Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
1,590 views|1,253 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,102 views|514 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can scale the solution if we need to.""Google Cloud Spanner is stable.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically.""The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

More Google Cloud Spanner Pros →

"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable.""I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries.""Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime.""The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Pros →

Cons
"The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling.""I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure.""The cost can be a bit high.""Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine."

More Google Cloud Spanner Cons →

"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment.""For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity.""A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited.""As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Spanner Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."
  • "The price is too much."
  • More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID transactions, and provides excellent integration and monitoring tools as well as… more »
    Top Answer:Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime.
    Top Answer:For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity. Additionally, there were restrictions on using it with the source databases… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    Views
    1,590
    Comparisons
    1,253
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    9.0
    9th
    Views
    1,102
    Comparisons
    514
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Google Spanner
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

    Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

    Sample Customers
    Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel
    IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Cloud Spanner is ranked 8th in Database as a Service with 4 reviews while Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is ranked 9th in Database as a Service with 4 reviews. Google Cloud Spanner is rated 9.0, while Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Spanner writes "A stable and scalable relational database that ensures a return on investment for its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer writes "Reduction in database creation time, provides good performance but challenges when interacting with the OCI console". Google Cloud Spanner is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, MongoDB Atlas and SQL Azure, whereas Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is most compared with Oracle Database as a Service, Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL and MongoDB Atlas. See our Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.