Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 25.0% mindshare in DS, compared to MongoDB’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 54 Amazon RDS reviews

5,264 Views
4,374 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 48 MongoDB Atlas reviews

3,963 Views
2,403 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas are two prominent database services. MongoDB Atlas has the upper hand in flexible schema design and horizontal scalability, while Amazon RDS is preferred for compatibility with various SQL databases and robust infrastructure.

Features: Amazon RDS offers automated backups, software patching, and read replicas. MongoDB Atlas includes auto-sharding, built-in data visualization tools, and real-time performance insights. MongoDB Atlas is dynamic for unstructured data, while Amazon RDS supports SQL databases.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could enhance its interface and provide more flexibility in scaling. MongoDB Atlas needs more detailed documentation and better performance optimization options. MongoDB Atlas users seek better support resources, whereas Amazon RDS users want improved scaling efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support. MongoDB Atlas has a quick setup but mixed reviews on customer support. Users find Amazon RDS more consistent in customer service, although MongoDB Atlas offers faster deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS users report favorable setup costs and good ROI with predictable pricing. MongoDB Atlas has flexible pricing that can seem higher initially, but its performance and advanced features justify the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.0%, down from 27.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 14.5%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance

It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon RDS is very easy to use."

"It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."

"The tool is very easy to use and configure."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and powerful."

"The initial setup is straightforward, and technical support is good."

"I use Amazon RDS to store and manage data securely. It helps me retrieve information and gain insights from the data that comes in for my business or specific applications."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a fully managed database, where they handle most of the administrative tasks and leaves the users more time to concentrate on business."

"It's a fully managed database, so that makes our life easier from the operational standpoint. That is the key, basically."

More Amazon RDS pros

"MongoDB Atlas is a platform as a service and it has proven to be particularly valuable due to its self-managing nature. This has allowed us to minimize the amount of time and effort required to manage it, as it effectively manages itself. Additionally, it is a complete solution when looking at its features."

"The solution is easy to use, the console is user-friendly, and overall a well-designed solution. It takes a complex system and makes it easy to understand. Additionally, the solution is always advancing and they provide a roadmap into what is coming in the future."

"You can start quickly on projects which allow you to store many things."

"The initial setup of MongoDB Atlas is straightforward...It is a scalable solution."

"For security reasons, I prefer MongoDB Atlas. It supports role-based access control, so you have an entity for each individual."

"Administering the solution is easy."

"This solution is very helpful due to its ease of use."

"Being schemaless is what I like best about MongoDB Atlas."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"You can only get access from the sales support. That means if you want to buy something or renew your subscription or upgrade, all these services are easily available. Yet, if you would like to get some technical support, you have to pay for it. You have to pay for an additional subscription."

"Amazon RDS should have a more user-friendly graphical user interface and include better database management options."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments."

"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with Microsoft products. Our clients use the Microsoft Tally application server. We already tried to create a reputation from, for example, an on-premises environment from our client to Amazon RDS using Microsoft Tally server, and we couldn't do that because we didn't have a strong user in RDS. We couldn't create a reputation from an on-premises environment from the Microsoft Tally server to RDS. I think that it would be a good implementation, and it would help us with this case."

"The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution."

"The product must add more older versions of the database engines."

"The setup might be a bit challenging for multi-level applications."

More Amazon RDS cons

"The installation was straightforward except for the network hardware because it was a little complicated to make the connection with our VPC on AWS."

"They could explore ways to facilitate deploying MongoDB containers within the platform."

"Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier."

"The initial setup is not too difficult but can be somewhat tricky."

"An area for improvement in MongoDB Atlas is that it does not support individual or personal database backup, though it supports cloud cluster backup."

"We need improved query performance."

"From an improvement standpoint, MongoDB can improve security."

"The product's data aggregation feature needs to work faster."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon RDS is cheaper compared to other tools."

"It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."

"We are paying for a service license."

"The price of Amazon RDS is reasonable."

"if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."

"AWS is becoming pretty expensive because cheap or absolutely free services have become paid services. Amazon RDS is not an expensive product, but Amazon's ecosystem is becoming increasingly expensive."

"The prices for different regions are different."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is not that expensive, but it can be, especially when we have deployed it across multiple zones."

"MongoDB Atlas is not expensive, and since it's a cloud-based solution, you pay by usage."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."

"We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"For me, MongoDB is expensive, but I think it is not so expensive for customers."

"Pricing could always be better."

"MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

One key improvement would be adding support for multi-storage paradigms, including columnar support, as seen in TiDB. The serverless support with Aurora could also be enhanced. Additionally, having...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 12% of the time

MongoDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 6% of the time

Upstash vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

April 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

RDS

Atlas

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.

MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.

What are the most important features?

Speed: Optimized for fast data handling and processing.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without hassle.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for efficient navigation.
Flexibility: Supports unstructured data with ease.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with cloud environments.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and operations.
Advanced Security: Protects data with robust security measures.
Schemaless Architecture: Enables dynamic data structure management.
Rich Query Support: Facilitates complex queries and analytics.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Easy Deployment: Streamlines the setup process in cloud environments.
Efficient Project Management: APIs and tools enhance workflow.
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential for more flexible pricing models.
Data Management: Automates backups and supports clustering.
Advanced Tools: Enables comprehensive data processing capabilities.

MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Edmodo

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.