Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas are two prominent database services. MongoDB Atlas has the upper hand in flexible schema design and horizontal scalability, while Amazon RDS is preferred for compatibility with various SQL databases and robust infrastructure.
Features: Amazon RDS offers automated backups, software patching, and read replicas. MongoDB Atlas includes auto-sharding, built-in data visualization tools, and real-time performance insights. MongoDB Atlas is dynamic for unstructured data, while Amazon RDS supports SQL databases.
Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could enhance its interface and provide more flexibility in scaling. MongoDB Atlas needs more detailed documentation and better performance optimization options. MongoDB Atlas users seek better support resources, whereas Amazon RDS users want improved scaling efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support. MongoDB Atlas has a quick setup but mixed reviews on customer support. Users find Amazon RDS more consistent in customer service, although MongoDB Atlas offers faster deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS users report favorable setup costs and good ROI with predictable pricing. MongoDB Atlas has flexible pricing that can seem higher initially, but its performance and advanced features justify the cost.
The documentation is quite good.
The official AWS technical support for Amazon RDS is helpful, providing 24/7 assistance for all business support cases with tools such as the health dashboard and AWS trusted advisor.
The features of MongoDB Atlas fall short, resulting in an average rating due to higher-expectation features still lacking in its offerings.
I have used them sometimes, even recently, and found the feedback to be spot on our needs.
For premium support, I would rate the support of MongoDB Atlas a nine.
Its automated scaling, both in storage and instances, is vital as it eliminates manual interventions.
Despite being a strong feature, scalability could be improved due to the lack of full functionality in autoscaling.
It's very much scalable, and I would rate scalability a nine.
MongoDB Atlas offers sharding as a scalability feature, although it does not perform as well as Oracle.
It is a stable product overall, with very few issues.
Amazon RDS is very stable when deployed correctly across different zones with the right configurations.
When it comes to OLTP transactions, its performance declines.
The stability of the product is very high.
Having native Change Data Capture (CDC) support would be beneficial, allowing for seamless integration with Kafka without relying on external technologies like Debezium.
Enabling performance insights to view query formats where the bottlenecks occur, identifying the fixes, slow queries, and missing indexes.
Improved data migration services would enable easier transitions to the cloud.
MongoDB Atlas should support containerization.
Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.
While Azure provides great services, long-term plans on AWS are 20% to 30% cheaper.
I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model.
I rate the price for Amazon as eight on a scale from one to ten.
The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.
For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers.
Database management is effective in Amazon RDS because it offers automated backups, high availability, read replicas, and support from multiple database engineers, while also providing security, monitoring and metrics, scalability.
Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS.
Amazon RDS makes it easier for me to manage databases compared to traditional databases like MongoDB or local host servers.
It is particularly useful for unstructured and semi-structured data because of its performance in these areas.
I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support.
The most valuable features of MongoDB Atlas in handling large data volumes include collection size and its NoSQL database capabilities.
Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.
MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.
MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.
What are the most important features?MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.
We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.