Alluvio Aternity vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.0. Riverbed holds a 0.7% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Alluvio Aternity

Read 39 Alluvio Aternity reviews

3,959 Views
2,494 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

943 Views
924 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Alluvio Aternity

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio Aternity and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management cater to monitoring and performance management. User reviews indicate Alluvio Aternity has a slight advantage in pricing and support, yet Cross-Enterprise excels in features and user satisfaction, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Alluvio Aternity offers thorough end-user experience monitoring, application diagnostics, and responsive performance metrics. Cross-Enterprise provides extensive application monitoring, in-depth analytics, and detailed insights, which users favor for its comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio Aternity can enhance integration capabilities, improve reporting functions, and expand data sources. Cross-Enterprise users find its complexity high, suggest a more intuitive interface, and recommend a reduced learning curve. Both products can refine specific areas, though their focuses differ.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio Aternity has smoother deployment and better customer service, according to user feedback. Cross-Enterprise presents a steeper deployment challenge and less responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio Aternity is more cost-effective with positive ROI feedback. Cross-Enterprise has higher initial setup costs but is considered worth the investment due to superior features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio Aternity

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (4th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (6th)

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

51st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio Aternity is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alluvio Aternity	0.7%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	98.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra

Technical Lead at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

Monitoring end-user activity has improved visibility into device and application performance

In my opinion, Riverbed can make Alluvio Aternity better by having the same Aternity agent help in security, such as antivirus or EDR, which would be useful, allowing customers to avoid having multiple agents installed on their endpoint machines. Deploying multiple agents can use the processor and utilize memory, so it's better to go with one agent. If one agent can do end-user activity monitoring and act as an EDR, then it would be better for the end-user, allowing easy avoidance of installing multiple agents on their machines.

Read full review

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very good in terms of performance; you don't have to wait forever to try and get reports or results, and it is quite quick to get everything that you need out of the software."

"The solution is highly stable and always available."

"There are many valuable features. If I had to single out one, it would be the UXI score. That's a proprietary Aternity score that tells you how good or bad the experience is for a user on that particular machine, for a particular app. It neatly encapsulates the pain of the user in a single score. It's very easy to find issues and then drill down further into those issues, based on that score."

"The implementation was pretty straightforward."

"The ability to quickly utilize the dashboard to gather information is valuable from a DXI perspective."

"The product is phenomenal; I really can't speak highly enough about how powerful the product is, and recently they cleared the one major hurdle with the product in that it wasn't very user friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio Aternity is the compiling and displaying of end-user data so that we can utilize it to troubleshoot proactively."

"The two most valuable features for us are its abilities to validate the customer experience and to measure performance before and after upgrades."

More Alluvio Aternity pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

Cons

"I think the workflow needs improvement"

"The licensing model doesn't suit the market we are in and has room for improvement."

"They have a lot of features built into the product, but it would be nice if they had some additional features that I think a lot of organizations would benefit from."

"Reliability: Issues interfering with the deployment and use of the product has made its use reduced in scope."

"Signature development process requires deep technical expertise in the application and in the use of their studio tools that help you create it."

"Aternity doesn't currently provide metrics about actual employee experience of all business-critical apps. It's something you have to build out. It's not 'canned' that way and there is a lot of configuration that you have to do to the environment to collect the data you want to collect and that is important to you."

"When it comes to a lot of the features that I would want, they will tell you they are in their SaaS version, which we don't use... They put all the new features on the SaaS solution and that's where you get the latest and greatest stuff... Why not have those features available for on-prem users?"

"Integrating the tool with other products is a challenge."

More Alluvio Aternity cons

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price for Alluvio Aternity is favorable."

"Pricing is a bit high. Don't take that as the "be all, end all"."

"The solution's price is pretty comparable to the industry."

"In my opinion they are asking a lot for their SaaS solution, but I also know that that's the direction they're going... The current, on-prem solution is probably a fair price."

"Our management squeezed Aternity pretty hard on the pricing, in my opinion a little too much. I advise negotiating for sure, but I do think it left kind of a sour taste in Aternity’s mouth that we were being so pushy despite the fact that we were only purchasing a small number of licenses."

"The pricing is reasonable for the value that it gives because it does allow you to measure the cost ramifications of direct productivity loss for spends in both your infrastructure and on endpoints."

"You have to purchase it for 12 months, which is an issue because a lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. There are a few additional costs. A lot of customers only get the essential licenses, and then they get what they call the application add-ons on top. They have to pay depending on how many customers and applications they want to monitor."

"It is definitely a premium solution; it is not an inexpensive product. We have to ensure that we are getting the most out of it in order to justify the cost. However, it is not cheap, especially when you want to install it on all your endpoints."

More Alluvio Aternity pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	32

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aternity?

Riverbed is costly in the Indian market; I would rate the pricing for Alluvio Aternity as a higher price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aternity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aternity?

The main use case for Alluvio Aternity is end-user activity monitoring, which is the process I'm mainly using currently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nexthink vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

SysTrack vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 4% of the time

More Alluvio Aternity Competitors

Zabbix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 40% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 30% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 16% of the time

Kloudfuse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 14% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity

May 2026

Download Alluvio Aternity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

Aternity, Workforce APM, Aternity Frontline, Riverbed SteelCenter Aternity

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Overview

Alluvio Aternity offers detailed insights into user experience, device health, and application response times. It provides real-time data and visibility for enhanced performance and incident management with customizable monitoring and flexible integration.

Alluvio Aternity is a robust monitoring tool designed for detailed environmental insights, dashboards, and trend analysis that help optimize application performance and incident management. Users benefit from its real-time data, which aids proactive troubleshooting by providing visibility into end-user devices. Custom dashboards, benchmarks, and flexible Tableau integration facilitate easy data manipulation, ensuring comprehensive monitoring of standard and custom applications. While the interface complexity and desire for simpler monitor building pose challenges, Aternity remains a valuable resource for digital experience monitoring and performance assessment, particularly for platforms like Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and Office 365.

What are the key features of Alluvio Aternity?

Real-Time Data: Provides immediate visibility into end-user devices for proactive troubleshooting.
Custom Dashboards: Allows creation of tailored dashboards for performance evaluation.
Trend Analysis: Offers insight into application performance trends to help optimize operations.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Tableau for versatile data manipulation.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Covers both standard and custom applications for wide-ranging insights.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Alluvio Aternity?

Enhanced Performance: Real-time data aids in improving application and device performance.
Proactive Troubleshooting: Immediate insights enable quicker response to issues.
Custom Monitoring: Tailored dashboards and monitoring cater to unique operational needs.
Flexible Data Use: Integration with tools like Tableau allows for effective data use and analysis.

Enterprises across industries leverage Alluvio Aternity for end-user activity monitoring and application performance assessment. They use its insights for digital experience monitoring and problem isolation, particularly in environments including remote sites and retail branches, measuring key metrics like CPU and memory usage.

Riverbed

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive insight into application performance across organizational boundaries. Designed to address complex application ecosystems, it ensures efficient monitoring and management of performance metrics, enhancing IT operations.

With Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, organizations can leverage a centralized approach to detecting, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues. The platform's analytics allow for proactive management by identifying trends and anomalies across applications. By offering end-to-end visibility into transactions and resource utilizations, it supports significant improvements in operational efficiency.

What are the key features?

End-to-End Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring across all components of the application landscape.
Centralized Dashboard: Aggregated data view for quick insights and decision-making.
Real-Time Analytics: Immediate data processing to detect and respond to issues quickly.
Anomaly Detection: Advanced algorithms identify deviations for proactive troubleshooting.
Resource Management: Optimize application resources through detailed usage analysis.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: By leveraging analytics, boost application efficiency and uptime.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced downtimes translate to lower operational costs.
Enhanced Decision Making: Access to reliable data leads to informed strategic decisions.
Increased Productivity: Swift issue resolution improves overall productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management integrates seamlessly to handle complex transactional systems. Its ability to provide real-time visibility and comprehensive analytics means that these sectors can ensure compliance and maintain high service standards.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Maersk, SwissRe, Travis Perkins, Michelin, National Instruments, Simmons & Simmons, Lighthouse Guild

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

April 2026

Free Report: Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.