Alluvio Aternity vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #86. Riverbed holds a 0.8% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Alluvio Aternity

Read 39 Alluvio Aternity reviews

5,193 Views
3,479 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

1,302 Views
1,276 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Alluvio Aternity

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio Aternity and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management cater to monitoring and performance management. User reviews indicate Alluvio Aternity has a slight advantage in pricing and support, yet Cross-Enterprise excels in features and user satisfaction, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Alluvio Aternity offers thorough end-user experience monitoring, application diagnostics, and responsive performance metrics. Cross-Enterprise provides extensive application monitoring, in-depth analytics, and detailed insights, which users favor for its comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio Aternity can enhance integration capabilities, improve reporting functions, and expand data sources. Cross-Enterprise users find its complexity high, suggest a more intuitive interface, and recommend a reduced learning curve. Both products can refine specific areas, though their focuses differ.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio Aternity has smoother deployment and better customer service, according to user feedback. Cross-Enterprise presents a steeper deployment challenge and less responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio Aternity is more cost-effective with positive ROI feedback. Cross-Enterprise has higher initial setup costs but is considered worth the investment due to superior features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio Aternity

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (5th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

86th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio Aternity is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alluvio Aternity	0.8%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	98.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra

Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

Monitoring end-user activity has improved visibility into device and application performance

In my opinion, Riverbed can make Alluvio Aternity better by having the same Aternity agent help in security, such as antivirus or EDR, which would be useful, allowing customers to avoid having multiple agents installed on their endpoint machines. Deploying multiple agents can use the processor and utilize memory, so it's better to go with one agent. If one agent can do end-user activity monitoring and act as an EDR, then it would be better for the end-user, allowing easy avoidance of installing multiple agents on their machines.

Read full review

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Other features we use heavily are the WiFi analyzer, the Skype for Business analyzer, and the troubleshooting functionalities. We also use the Device Health quite religiously here for troubleshooting devices that are unhealthy, when we're talking about things like high CPU or memory consumption, or file system problems within the users' workstations."

"The user experience it provides is the most valuable feature for us."

"It's one of those rare, genuine products that does what it says on the tin."

"When employees complain of trouble with applications or devices, Aternity enables us to see exactly what they see as they engage with apps, allowing us to focus our troubleshooting and quickly perform fault domain isolation across branches, users, and applications."

"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."

"The dashboards and the analysis tools, especially the navigator, are great features and are very valuable."

"This is the only tool we use to show us what the user is doing."

"We have pictures from the backend, from a network or a server perspective, but we didn't have any user data; collecting that data manually was pretty time-intensive and relatively inaccurate, and with Aternity, we now have the data."

More Alluvio Aternity pros

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

Cons

"To monitor these transactions, you need to look at it, analyze it and capture it. It requires a little bit of work, but in an environment like ours, you need it to be easier."

"I would like to get more granular detail. In regards to defining the applications and activities upfront, that can be challenging. Simplifying that would be a big win. One of the things that I know they are already working on is a verbose mode."

"The version that I've seen, the one thing it doesn't do which I don't know if it's really meant to do is that you're getting all the view from the client side but sometimes it's not possible to look on the server side at anything that's happening on that side of things."

"Signature development process requires deep technical expertise in the application and in the use of their studio tools that help you create it."

"It is definitely a premium solution; it is not an inexpensive product. We have to ensure that we are getting the most out of it in order to justify the cost."

"When they moved from Version 8 to Version 9, the customers lost so much control of what they could do with the product."

"I would like to see more granular performance counters collected and viewable from the endpoints. That would be great."

"I can see the location and computer model and I can see a bunch of different attributes. But one thing I can't see is the Internet Explorer version."

More Alluvio Aternity cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is definitely a premium solution; it is not an inexpensive product. We have to ensure that we are getting the most out of it in order to justify the cost. However, it is not cheap, especially when you want to install it on all your endpoints."

"The pricing for the users and agents is reasonable compared to other solutions and vendors."

"Regarding cost, compared to other solutions, Aternity is pretty low. It's definitely lower-cost than others that we looked at, like Nexthink."

"Its licensing cost is very low. That's one of the reasons why we have kept it for so long. We get more than a 70% discount on the maintenance licenses. Its cost is very low for us, but if you buy it new, it would be much more expensive at the retail price."

"You have to purchase it for 12 months, which is an issue because a lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. There are a few additional costs. A lot of customers only get the essential licenses, and then they get what they call the application add-ons on top. They have to pay depending on how many customers and applications they want to monitor."

"The pricing is reasonable for the value that it gives because it does allow you to measure the cost ramifications of direct productivity loss for spends in both your infrastructure and on endpoints."

"If the scale of your monitoring will be to go everywhere in an organization, a site license is key."

"It's not a cheap product. There are no two ways about that. If you compare it with a couple of the other solutions operating in the space, it might be on the slightly more expensive side, but it is one of those tools where, once you've got it, you understand the true value. You will get that money back."

More Alluvio Aternity pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	32

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aternity?

Riverbed is costly in the Indian market; I would rate the pricing for Alluvio Aternity as a higher price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aternity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aternity?

The main use case for Alluvio Aternity is end-user activity monitoring, which is the process I'm mainly using currently.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 10% of the time

Nexthink vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 5% of the time

More Alluvio Aternity Competitors

Zabbix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 26% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 21% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

Kloudfuse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Actional vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity

August 2026

Download Alluvio Aternity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

Aternity, Workforce APM, Aternity Frontline, Riverbed SteelCenter Aternity

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Overview

Alluvio Aternity offers detailed insights into user experience, device health, and application response times. It provides real-time data and visibility for enhanced performance and incident management with customizable monitoring and flexible integration.

Alluvio Aternity is a robust monitoring tool designed for detailed environmental insights, dashboards, and trend analysis that help optimize application performance and incident management. Users benefit from its real-time data, which aids proactive troubleshooting by providing visibility into end-user devices. Custom dashboards, benchmarks, and flexible Tableau integration facilitate easy data manipulation, ensuring comprehensive monitoring of standard and custom applications. While the interface complexity and desire for simpler monitor building pose challenges, Aternity remains a valuable resource for digital experience monitoring and performance assessment, particularly for platforms like Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and Office 365.

What are the key features of Alluvio Aternity?

Real-Time Data: Provides immediate visibility into end-user devices for proactive troubleshooting.
Custom Dashboards: Allows creation of tailored dashboards for performance evaluation.
Trend Analysis: Offers insight into application performance trends to help optimize operations.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Tableau for versatile data manipulation.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Covers both standard and custom applications for wide-ranging insights.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Alluvio Aternity?

Enhanced Performance: Real-time data aids in improving application and device performance.
Proactive Troubleshooting: Immediate insights enable quicker response to issues.
Custom Monitoring: Tailored dashboards and monitoring cater to unique operational needs.
Flexible Data Use: Integration with tools like Tableau allows for effective data use and analysis.

Enterprises across industries leverage Alluvio Aternity for end-user activity monitoring and application performance assessment. They use its insights for digital experience monitoring and problem isolation, particularly in environments including remote sites and retail branches, measuring key metrics like CPU and memory usage.

Riverbed

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive insight into application performance across organizational boundaries. Designed to address complex application ecosystems, it ensures efficient monitoring and management of performance metrics, enhancing IT operations.

With Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, organizations can leverage a centralized approach to detecting, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues. The platform's analytics allow for proactive management by identifying trends and anomalies across applications. By offering end-to-end visibility into transactions and resource utilizations, it supports significant improvements in operational efficiency.

What are the key features?

End-to-End Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring across all components of the application landscape.
Centralized Dashboard: Aggregated data view for quick insights and decision-making.
Real-Time Analytics: Immediate data processing to detect and respond to issues quickly.
Anomaly Detection: Advanced algorithms identify deviations for proactive troubleshooting.
Resource Management: Optimize application resources through detailed usage analysis.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: By leveraging analytics, boost application efficiency and uptime.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced downtimes translate to lower operational costs.
Enhanced Decision Making: Access to reliable data leads to informed strategic decisions.
Increased Productivity: Swift issue resolution improves overall productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management integrates seamlessly to handle complex transactional systems. Its ability to provide real-time visibility and comprehensive analytics means that these sectors can ensure compliance and maintain high service standards.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Maersk, SwissRe, Travis Perkins, Michelin, National Instruments, Simmons & Simmons, Lighthouse Guild

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

August 2026

Free Report: Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.