"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
AgilePoint is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while K2 is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while K2 is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes "Excellent workflow with good stability and good forms". On the other hand, the top reviewer of K2 writes "Doesn't require customized coding but lacks flexibility and can feel cumbersome". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, Nintex Workflow, IBM BPM, Camunda Platform and Agiloft Workflow and BPM, whereas K2 is most compared with Nintex Workflow, Camunda Platform, IBM BPM and Pega BPM. See our AgilePoint vs. K2 report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
