ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.4, while Jitterbit is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.4% mindshare in WA, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

1,616 Views
487 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Harmony

Read 13 Jitterbit Harmony reviews

88 Views
27 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Jitterbit Harmony

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Jitterbit Harmony and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the integration and automation solutions category. Jitterbit Harmony often has the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while ActiveBatch stands out for its advanced feature set.

Features: Jitterbit Harmony provides seamless data integration with plug-and-play connectors, simplifying data workflows without requiring much coding. It excels in ease of API creation and management, allowing quick mapping between files and databases. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers sophisticated task scheduling and workload automation capabilities, including pre-built jobs and flexible script integration. It provides comprehensive automation for complex environments, leveraging robust API integrations and simplified processing controls.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Harmony could enhance its feature set to match complex automation needs and enrich its pre-configured connector list. It may also benefit from expanding its API functionalities. ActiveBatch by Redwood could streamline its setup process to reduce initial deployment time and may need simplification in its user interface for more intuitive navigation. It could also focus on optimizing user training materials for quicker onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Harmony is known for quick deployment and attentive customer service, providing smooth integration experiences. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires more involved setups but compensates with robust support options that assist users with complex functionalities. Both vendors are committed to helping users navigate their systems effectively, though ActiveBatch’s process may involve more detailed assistance due to its advanced capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Harmony offers competitive pricing, translating to quicker ROI for small- to mid-sized projects through straightforward integrations. Conversely, ActiveBatch by Redwood has a higher initial cost but provides extensive capabilities that deliver substantial long-term ROI, justifying the investment for handling large-scale automation tasks. While Jitterbit is cost-effective for simpler projects, ActiveBatch excels in delivering value for comprehensive automation strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th)

Jitterbit Harmony

Ranking in Workload Automation

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (35th), Cloud Data Integration (19th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Harmony is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Mohamed Abd Kader

Head of Enterprise Architecture at Mantrac Group

An easy-to-setup solution with good stability

We use Jitterbit to connect cloud solutions with our on-premises ERP system We connect cloud solutions to our on-premise ERP system easily using Jitterbit. It is its most valuable feature. The solution's API management capabilities need improvement. We have been using the solution for almost…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is its stability. We've only had very minor issues and generally they have happened because someone has applied a patch on a Windows operating system and it has caused some grief. We've actually been able to resolve those issues quite quickly with ActiveBatch. In all the time that I've had use of ActiveBatch, it hasn't failed completely once. Uptime is almost 100 percent."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible."

"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."

"By implementing a sophisticated scheduling mechanism, the system allows for the precise triggering of jobs at user-selected frequencies, enabling a seamless and automated execution of tasks according to specified time intervals."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"It has helped with scheduling complex jobs with simple scripts."

"We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform regular, repetitive tasks in a more reliable way."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."

"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."

"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."

"Easy integration with Salesforce"

"It is a scalable solution."

"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."

"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."

More Jitterbit Harmony pros

Cons

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application."

"An area for improvement in ActiveBatch Workload Automation is its interface or GUI. It could be a little better. There isn't any additional feature I'd like to see in the tool, except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out."

"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."

"They should offer pricing that is more affordable."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."

"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."

"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."

"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."

"Its API management capabilities need improvement."

"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."

"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."

"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."

More Jitterbit Harmony cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"

"The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."

"I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."

"Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."

"Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 15% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 12% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 26% of the time

SnapLogic vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 19% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 16% of the time

More Jitterbit Harmony Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

June 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

June 2025

Download Jitterbit Harmony product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Jitterbit Harmony is a comprehensive platform for data integration and API management, enabling seamless synchronization and automation across cloud-based and on-premises applications.

Users leverage Jitterbit Harmony to integrate systems like ERP and CRM applications, simplifying complex data workflows and enhancing automation. It supports efficient data migration and ensures smooth connectivity, handling diverse integration needs and helping streamline business processes. Users emphasize its drag-and-drop functionality and extensive templates, which contribute to its robust performance. However, improvements are needed in data mapping, error message clarity, and documentation, especially when dealing with large data volumes.

What are the key features of Jitterbit Harmony?

Easy Integration: Facilitates connecting various applications effortlessly.
Powerful Data Transformation: Offers tools for complex data workflows.
Seamless Connectivity: Supports efficient data migration between cloud and on-premises applications.
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: User-friendly interface for streamlined operations.
Extensive Pre-Built Templates: Provides numerous templates for quicker deployment.
Robust Performance: Ensures reliable operation even with complex tasks.
Flexible Data Format Handling: Manages different data types and formats efficiently.
Efficient API Management: Simplifies and maintains API requests and integrations.

What benefits should users look at when evaluating Jitterbit Harmony?

Scalability: Can grow with your business needs, handling more extensive operations seamlessly.
Automation: Improves business process automation, saving time and resources.
Data Synchronization: Ensures real-time data accuracy and flow between systems.
Support: Provides strong customer support to address integration challenges.

Companies across retail, manufacturing, healthcare, and finance sectors use Jitterbit Harmony to integrate critical applications and automate workflows. In retail, it connects inventory systems with sales platforms, reducing manual effort. Manufacturers sync their ERP systems with supply chain software, optimizing operations. Healthcare organizations integrate patient management systems with insurance databases, streamlining patient care. Financial institutions use it to connect accounting software with banking systems, ensuring real-time financial data exchange.

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony

June 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Jitterbit Harmony report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.