We performed a comparison between Acronis Cyber Protect and IBM Storage Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main reasons that our customers like Acronis are that it is very strong and easy to use."
"The user interface (UI) is easy to use."
"One of its most valuable aspects is its user-friendly interface."
"Acronis is a flexible solution. It can back up workstations, endpoints, and even your virtual environments and cloud-based environments. So, we can do the backup of the whole gamut of products."
"The solution has all the features I need and user friendly."
"In my opinion, it's the best product for end-users and PCs."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that you can archive backups quite easily and minimize the amount of space you're using."
"Consistency and reliability. The interface is easy to understand and consistent across applications. While not 100%, it is a very reliable backup solution."
"The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future."
"The tool's backup engine is very powerful. Previously, our client finished backup with HPE product in 48 hours. IBM Storage Protect completes backup in 8 hours."
"No technical support and minimal documentation."
"The whole product structure is confusing. You can actually get to do what you want to do. But Acronis seems to have a singular ability to make things difficult."
"The solution needs to have better stability. I would like to improve the tool’s support through calls."
"It supports Microsoft SQL and Microsoft Exchange, but it does not support Oracle databases or Postgres."
"The support and documentation must be improved."
"I would like to have more hardware space. It would make it better. I would like to have two more terabytes."
"We have issues with the SQL databases which are a little shaky."
"The product needs to have a simple DR process."
"The product should improve its GUI. It should also support Windows clustering."
"The solution is expensive."
Acronis Cyber Protect is ranked 10th in Backup and Recovery with 117 reviews while IBM Storage Protect is ranked 43rd in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Acronis Cyber Protect is rated 8.2, while IBM Storage Protect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Acronis Cyber Protect writes " Good backup solution but challenges with the stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Storage Protect writes "A stable enterprise solution for backup and restore". Acronis Cyber Protect is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Azure Backup and Commvault Cloud, whereas IBM Storage Protect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect. See our Acronis Cyber Protect vs. IBM Storage Protect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
