No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
AutoSys Workload Automation Logo

AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is AutoSys Workload Automation?

AutoSys Workload Automation delivers comprehensive scheduling capabilities and integration features, offering users scalability and efficiency in automation across platforms. Its enhanced user-friendliness and security make it a reliable choice for job scheduling and workload management.

Get the AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation, Control-M, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and more!
AutoSys Workload Automation is the #4 ranked solution in top Workload Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give AutoSys Workload Automation an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. AutoSys Workload Automation is most commonly compared to Control-M: AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M. AutoSys Workload Automation is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 72% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 39% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
AutoSys Workload Automation
May 2026
Get the report
Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Featured AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

Read more reviews

AutoSys Workload Automation mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation in the Workload Automation category stands at 7.0%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AutoSys Workload Automation7.0%
Control-M12.1%
Automic Automation5.8%
Other75.1%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationMay 4, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 4, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-MMay 4, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic AutomationMay 4, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMSMay 4, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.412.1%98%201 interviewsAdd to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4.02.7%92%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

AutoSys Workload Automation offers robust scheduling, cross-platform integration, and scalability. Users highlight ease of use through a user-friendly UI and powerful security. It's praised for handling vast job volumes efficiently and providing real-time monitoring. The system streamlines automation processes, reduces manual effort, and ensures high availability. Advanced features include predictive analytics, dynamic scheduling, flexible agent configurations, and JIL language support, enabling efficient job management and seamless integration with diverse business platforms.
  • "The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher, the solution has a user-friendly user interface, it is very simple to use, you have a scope of all your jobs, and it lets you monitor everything in these jobs."
  • "It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have, monitoring-wise it is really good, and it also gives us the ability to connect different software processes."
  • "We really like the product and its functions; it works, and we like its stability, scalability, and robustness."

Room for Improvement

AutoSys Workload Automation users highlight the need for an improved graphical user interface, enhanced integration with cloud services, better documentation, and more robust reporting features. They seek more complex scheduling options, cross-platform capabilities, and seamless iDASH integration. Additionally, concerns exist about the complex installation process, limited monitoring features, and high licensing costs. Improving these aspects would enhance overall satisfaction and usability across various organizations.
  • "AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment."
  • "I am not sure whether it is our limitation or a tool limitation because we haven't yet explored it, but whenever we look for different types of reporting, we have some limitations in getting those."
  • "We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product."

ROI

AutoSys Workload Automation provided a positive return on investment. Users have expressed satisfaction with the software's ability to efficiently manage and automate workloads, resulting in improved productivity and cost savings. 

The solution was praised for its user-friendly interface, robust features, and reliable performance, leading to enhanced efficiency and streamlined processes. 

Pricing

AutoSys Workload Automation pricing experiences vary among enterprises, with several noting high costs. Licensing typically involves annual and monthly models, influenced by user and environment needs. Many organizations express that while pricing may be expensive, the value aligns with their business needs. The removal of the unlimited agent installation scheme has affected perceptions. Pricing can range from $8,000 to $10,000 annually for server setup, with user licenses costing up to $130,000 for a multi-year period.
  • "The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."
  • "We paid to use the solution monthly."
  • "I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

Popular Use Cases

AutoSys Workload Automation is utilized for enterprise job scheduling, batch processing, and automated file transfers across diverse platforms. Various users employ it for cross-platform dependency management, handling millions of jobs daily, including financial transactions, SAP job submissions, and IT process automation. It supports the integration of mainframe and non-mainframe systems for retail, banking, and insurance industries, providing stable, robust performance and addressing enterprise-wide automation needs like backups and infrastructure-related tasks.

Service and Support

Customers report excellent service and knowledgeable support staff at level two, although initial contacts may be lacking. They appreciate dedicated technicians during migrations and value quick responses, often within 24 hours. Some note a decline in quality since the Broadcom acquisition, and escalation can be frustrating. Many users emphasize helpfulness and strong communication, with most issues resolved efficiently. Users rate technical support highly, often between 8.5 to 10 out of 10.

Deployment

AutoSys Workload Automation's initial setup varied in complexity, with many finding it straightforward, though some encountered challenges. Transitioning from older systems required planning, with specialists aiding smoother processes. Users noted that migration could be complex but found the setup manageable with experience and proper guidance. Installation was generally quick, yet larger setups demanded more technical skills. Improved features over time enhanced ease of use, though high availability setups required careful planning.

Scalability

AutoSys Workload Automation handles scalability effectively, supporting thousands of jobs and users daily. Its architecture allows seamless integration across multiple environments, facilitating adaptability during infrastructure changes. Users appreciate the ability to expand without encountering hurdles, as the system scales to accommodate growing demands. With robust support in place, enterprises operate smoothly, benefiting from flexibility and efficient management capabilities. Many consider it highly scalable, maintaining performance even under increased workloads.

Stability

AutoSys Workload Automation demonstrates high stability with few encountering minor issues. It remains stable across various versions and configurations. Many report it as highly reliable, even under heavy workloads, with no critical issues affecting core functionality. Some experience problems with specific interfaces or due to external infrastructure, not the software itself. Users praise its dynamic nature in job scheduling and failover capabilities, maintaining operations 24/7. Stability scores often reach nine or ten out of ten.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise63
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business235
Midsize Enterprise131
Large Enterprise948
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
39%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
Retailer
5%
Computer Software Company
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Government
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
University
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Non Profit
1%

Compare AutoSys Workload Automation with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation

AutoSys Workload Automation is well-regarded for its stability and intuitive graphical interface which facilitates efficient job scheduling across platforms. Users find its security features effective in ensuring controlled access, and appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of jobs while providing seamless orchestration and monitoring. However, the interface could benefit from modernization. Enhancements are suggested for reporting features and job flow clarity. Its integration with mobility and cloud platforms requires improvement as current support remains limited. Improving monitoring capabilities, managing cross-application dependencies, and simplifying upgrades are essential. Additionally, addressing the costly licensing model and enhancing high-level system process views are significant for maintaining competitiveness in automation.

What are AutoSys's key features?
  • Scheduling Capabilities: Provides robust and flexible scheduling options across platforms.
  • Integration Features: Allows seamless automation with diverse systems.
  • Security Measures: Ensures controlled and secure access to resources.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive GUI for simplified use.
  • High Job Volume Support: Efficiently manages a large number of jobs with ease.
What benefits can users expect?
  • Reduced Manual Efforts: Automates processes minimizing the need for manual intervention.
  • Enhanced Visibility: Improves oversight and monitoring of tasks.
  • Effective Troubleshooting: Streamlines troubleshooting with well-organized workflows.
  • Scalability: Scales across diverse environments to meet enterprise demands.
  • Improved Efficiency: Increases operational efficiency with optimized automation.

AutoSys Workload Automation is extensively used in industries like banking, insurance, and retail for job scheduling, batch management, and server workload automation. It supports data processing for enterprise tasks, monitors tasks, and manages cross-platform dependencies, proving to be a reliable tool for complex job orchestration in these sectors.

AutoSys Workload Automation was previously known as CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE .

AutoSys Workload Automation customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Related questions

  • 52
Can I prioritize jobs to manage resource allocation in AutoSys?
  • 24
What are some of the ways AutoSys has helped your company?
  • 110
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
  • 139
Which is Best: Scheduler Control M, CA or Tidal?
  • 60
When evaluating Workload Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 47
What should businesses start to automate first when starting off with an enterprise scheduling tool?
  • 60
What is the best workload automation tool in the market?
  • 105
How does Control-M rank in the Workload Automation market compared with other products?
  • 117
Should project automation software be integrated with cloud-based tools?
  • 40
Why is Workload Automation important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Workload Automation

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation
JAMS vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
JAMS vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Nintex Process Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Nintex Process Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs AutoSys Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation
AWS Step Functions vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
AWS Step Functions vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs AutoSys Workload Automation
Tidal by Redwood vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
Tidal by Redwood vs AutoSys Workload Automation
VisualCron vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
VisualCron vs AutoSys Workload Automation
BMC AMI Ops vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
BMC AMI Ops vs AutoSys Workload Automation
OpCon vs AutoSys Workload Automation Logo
OpCon vs AutoSys Workload Automation
See all alternatives
 
AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I find AutoSys Workload Automation stable, scalable, and easy to use for infrastructure tasks, but it needs better cloud integration and web UI improvements. Pricing changes post-acquisition are concerning, prompting us to explore alternative scheduling tools.
Program Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I worked with AutoSys Workload Automation, valuing its scalability and reliability despite its limited integration compared to Control-M. While it excels in managing large job volumes, its cost can be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
Technical Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5I find Autosys a robust and reliable enterprise batch scheduler with simple setup and good performance. However, it lags competitors in functionality, and despite its strong stability, I believe better, more feature-rich options exist today.
Application Developer / Freelancer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.0I use AutoSys to manage thousands of scheduled jobs, benefiting from its reusable configurations, user-friendly UI, and security features. While it reduces manual workload and offers ROI through resource savings, improvements in monitoring and APIs are needed.
Technical Lead at Natwest4.0AutoSys Workload Automation helps centralize our bank's non-mainframe processes and is valued for its performance, scalability, and user-friendliness. However, the UI is outdated, and manual tasks and tool integration could be improved. It delivers high ROI by reducing manual efforts.
Architect & Technical Director at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees4.0I've used AutoSys Workload Automation for nearly 20 years; it's easy to use, scalable, and simplifies job scheduling, though the UI could improve. It integrates well with events and offers solid monitoring, reporting, and documentation.
Technical Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5I find AutoSys Workload Automation robust, stable, and quick for enterprise batch scheduling, with easy setup and good support. However, it lacks advanced workflow features and notification capabilities compared to competitors, leading me to rate it 7/10 overall.
Manager at Capgemini4.0I've used AutoSys for a year, finding it stable and scalable for client support in insurance. While performance is good, I desire improved reporting for job dependency, success/failure details, and more monitoring. I rate it an eight.