AutoSys Workload Automation vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Broadcom and Salesforce are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Salesforce is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 10.5% mindshare in WA, compared to Salesforce’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 82 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,729 Views
5,922 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 59 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

11,835 Views
1,539 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and AutoSys Workload Automation compete in the enterprise solutions category. MuleSoft has an advantage in integration and API management, while AutoSys excels in job scheduling and workload automation.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers extensive API management, over 200 standard connectors, and visual development tools for API design, catering to hybrid integration needs. AutoSys Workload Automation provides advanced scheduling capabilities, reliable execution across distributed environments, and robust security features.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft could benefit from better runtime management, more frequent updates, and improved customer support. Users also note the complex pricing model as a barrier. AutoSys should enhance its user interface, improve analytics capabilities, and expand support for modern systems, alongside revisiting its licensing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers diverse deployment options across cloud and on-premises environments, though its technical support is mixed. AutoSys focuses on on-premises deployment, generally praised for responsive customer service, albeit with a dated support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft's pricing is complex and high, more suited for large enterprises, but offers strong ROI through effective API management. AutoSys has a traditional pricing model, providing good ROI for organizations with complex scheduling needs, though it may not be competitive for all business sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Workload Automation

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 10.5%, down from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 5.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has been stable."

"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"

"It gives us flexibility when doing releases. We can make changes for one day in a PDS member, since we stage our jobs by date, and the next day the normal job definitions are run."

"Running anything in crontab, you need to put a lot of logic into it to make it work. With this product, you don't have to worry about it. You have the schedule object where you put all the dates or holidays in it, and it does it for you."

"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."

"AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."

"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."

"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"API management."

"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"The API-led connectivity approach of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers specific functionality based on various conditions."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."

"The scalability is poor because I cannot use it for all automation solutions."

"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."

"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."

"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."

"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."

"Ease of implementation for upgrades."

"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"The stability could be better."

"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."

"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."

"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."

"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

"It is overpriced."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

46%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 32% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

August 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

July 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation efficiently manages complex workloads across platforms, offering high availability and seamless platform integration. Its reliability and scalability are valued for enterprise-level automation, enhancing job management and reducing manual effort with robust scheduling and advanced security.

AutoSys Workload Automation is known for its user-friendly capabilities, effectively handling cross-platform job scheduling with mainframe integration. It supports high availability, ensuring reliable performance for critical operations. Despite enhancements needed in its GUI and integration capabilities, AutoSys remains effective for batch processing, file transfers, ETL, and managing dependencies across servers and applications. Improvements are suggested for deployment complexity and monitoring features. More effective licensing and scalability solutions, along with modern subscription models and cloud integration, could address cost and automation barriers.

What are AutoSys Workload Automation's key features?

Robust Scheduling: Automates job scheduling across multiple platforms efficiently.
Advanced Security: Ensures secure management of workloads.
High Availability: Maintains performance during critical operations.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly integrates with diverse systems.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise demands.

What benefits should users expect from AutoSys Workload Automation?

Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual task management.
Enhanced Job Management: Improves oversight and control over job processes.
Flexibility in Scheduling: Offers adaptable scheduling and monitoring options.
Reliability: Consistent job execution without failures.
Security: Protects enterprise-level operations.

In industries like banking, insurance, and retail, AutoSys Workload Automation facilitates 24/7 automated job execution, ensuring smooth task automation. It allows companies to manage enterprise workloads effectively, catering to batch processing, file transfers, and handling job dependencies in a consistent manner.

Broadcom

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

July 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.