| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | Jul 28, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jul 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Visual Studio Test Professional vs Tricentis Tosca | Jul 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText Functional Testing | Jul 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Visual Studio Test Professional vs UiPath Test Cloud | Jul 28, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 19.2% | 96% | 111 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 9.4% | 87% | 97 interviewsAdd to research |
Test Professional is a versatile solution that can be utilized for a wide range of projects such as integration, analysis, reporting, development, and BIS or data-related projects that are based on Microsoft technologies. While it is a useful tool for many purposes, we primarily use it for security testing as it excels in this area.
User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable. We can integrate it with other platforms and even use Python. So, it's not limited to just one platform and has good coding capabilities.
One significant issue is when there are multiple annual updates, and we are developing a project, it should be compatible. We may need to either upgrade or downgrade the project, depending on the package. That can be a difficult and bothersome task. We need to maintain the same version of the environment. So compatibility should be improved.
For additional features, it can also support the Python language. We can develop using Python features in Visual Studio. It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve. Visual Studio is very open, and we can develop in no time.
I have used it for five to six years, primarily for community, enterprise, and solution projects. I am using the latest version.
It is stable enough, I would rate it nine out of ten.
It has good scalability. We have six to seven users currently working with it.
The setup is straightforward. The deployment process can be executed quickly. Once it's in our system, we can use it for any development project based on the project we need. The deployment can be done in-house without any technical team necessary.
Deployment usually takes about ten minutes, and I can do it myself in-house.
It's costly, but not too much, and it's just within our budget. One good thing is we can make use of community relations.
There aren't any additional costs, like extra system integration or something. However, there may be some differences in the pricing since the PS will be different. As a standard version, it will have most of the capabilities.
The environment is straightforward and user-friendly, so there's not much of a learning curve. I used it for my project, and it worked well, and I definitely recommend it for future use.
Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.
