Eggplant Test vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Keysight Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
504 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,306 Views
379 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Eggplant Test compete in the software testing domain. Eggplant Test has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, making it worth the higher price.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers integration with other Microsoft tools, robust performance testing, and good customer support. Eggplant Test provides automation, capability to test on various devices and platforms, and powerful automation features.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better cross-platform testing and improved debugging features. Eggplant Test could use more intuitive reporting tools, enhanced ease of use, and better user accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional is easier to deploy, especially in Microsoft product environments, with favorable customer service. Eggplant Test has a steeper learning curve but offers responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional offers competitive pricing and good ROI due to lower costs. Eggplant Test, while more expensive, delivers significant ROI with its advanced features, justifying the higher price.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,481 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.

Sentiment score

6.8

Visual Studio Test Professional boosts efficiency and productivity with cost-saving benefits, significantly enhancing development environments and quality.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.

Sentiment score

6.8

Customers appreciate Visual Studio Test Professional's support, though some highlight navigation challenges and delays reaching knowledgeable staff.

I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.

Sentiment score

7.4

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, adaptable, and supports large teams, though some find licensing costs a concern.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.

Sentiment score

7.9

Visual Studio Test Professional is stable with high ratings, minor bugs, and reliable updates, despite occasional third-party integration issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.

Visual Studio Test Professional needs better integration, user-friendliness, scalability, modern features, and improved performance and documentation.

For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.

Visual Studio Test Professional's pricing is high, yet valued for its functionality, offering free and professional licensing options.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

The price is expensive.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.

Visual Studio Test Professional offers robust integration, user-friendly tools, and customization for efficient cross-platform development and team collaboration.

It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

It supports cross-platform functionality.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	2.8%
Eggplant Test	3.6%
Other	93.6%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Performing Arts

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 15% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

December 2025

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.