We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."
"We have seen a return on investment."
"Technical support is helpful."
"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."
"The solution is scalable."
"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."
"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."
"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The summary reports could be improved."
"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."
"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."
"The performance could be a bit better."
"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."
"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."
"Reporting facilities can be better."
"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The documentation is limited."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Klocwork, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
