"It's user friendly. We haven't had any issues so far. It's flexible. If we need something, we can always contact the owner in our headquarters to make a configuration."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution."
"The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"TFS is scalable with different Microsoft tools for test management but it is not scalable with other third-party tools."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"TFS isn't a great tool if you're on the cloud."
"Overall, I think it would be useful to have something similar where Microsoft comes up with supporting concepts of scaling Agile in TFS so that clients don't have to look for a separate tool."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
TFS is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. TFS is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Offers lots of features, including memory analysis and code sharing". TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, Katalon Studio and Ranorex Studio. See our TFS vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.