Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Application Quality Management compete in the software development and lifecycle management category. Visual Studio Test Professional seems to have an upper hand due to its ease of use and integration, as highlighted in user feedback.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional provides robust integrated development tools ideal for C# and .NET projects, offering functionalities such as code testing with unit testing and debugging tools including IntelliSense. OpenText Application Quality Management offers comprehensive application lifecycle management features like requirement traceability, defect tracking, and test execution, emphasizing integration with automation tools and reporting processes.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional users suggest better integration with Continuous Integration tools like Jenkins, enhanced stability, and improved documentation, while also pointing out the high licensing fees. OpenText Application Quality Management could refine its reporting features, user interface, and browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, and address concerns around its complex and expensive licensing structures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer deployment flexibility across on-premises, private cloud, and public cloud environments. Visual Studio Test Professional is praised for its helpful community and online forums for troubleshooting, although there are some criticisms about Microsoft’s official support. OpenText has strong technical support, though the complexity of installation and setup poses challenges for some users.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional offers a range of pricing options including free community editions and professional licenses, although it is sometimes seen as expensive. It provides good ROI due to its comprehensive development tools. OpenText Application Quality Management is often noted as expensive, with high licensing costs that may deter smaller businesses, though its comprehensive feature set can offer significant ROI for large enterprises.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The price is expensive.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 12.5% |
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 2.7% |
| Other | 84.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
