Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the software development and testing tools category. Visual Studio Test Professional has the upper hand due to its extensive integration capabilities and community support.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates with management data and test cases, enhancing tracking and reporting. It includes IntelliSense, ReSharper, and is robust with Microsoft tools like .NET, appreciated for stability and documentation. OpenText Functional Testing supports versatile scripting languages such as C# and Java, integrates well with Visual Studio, and is developer-friendly, helping in the development cycle.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could improve tool integration, stability, performance, memory analysis, and Linux support. OpenText Functional Testing needs enhanced stability, better JavaScript support, expanded cross-browser testing, improved toolset integration, and reduced setup complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments with strong online community support, though Microsoft’s documentation could be more user-friendly. OpenText primarily uses on-premises and cloud environments, with satisfactory customer support. Visual Studio benefits from better community backing.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is considered pricey, justified by capabilities that improve developer efficiency. It has a free community version for non-commercial use, while enterprise licensing can be significant. OpenText is expensive with flexible licensing. Visual Studio’s ROI benefits from productivity gains, while OpenText is noted to be costly compared to open-source alternatives.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
The price is expensive.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
