Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the testing solutions category, each catering to diverse needs. Visual Studio Test Professional appears to have an advantage in integration with Microsoft environments, especially for users already in the .NET and C# ecosystems, while OpenText excels in flexibility and developer-focused features across multiple technologies.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional includes Source Control TFS, integration and tracking of test cases with TFS and MTM, and valuable SSIS reports. It supports C# and .NET projects, allowing seamless collaboration and deployment. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers supports test framework coding in C# and Java, integrates well with various environments, and features strong object recognition for comprehensive coverage.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional users highlight the need for improved independent test integration, enhanced stability, and cost-effective solutions with better unit testing tools. OpenText Functional Testing requires ease-of-use enhancements, cheaper pricing, and improved desktop application support. Both solutions should aim for better integration with modern productivity tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional offers diverse deployment options including On-premises, Private Cloud, and Public Cloud. OpenText Functional Testing is mainly On-premises with some Public Cloud support. Visual Studio is praised for its customer service, with active forums and community support, whereas OpenText receives positive feedback but lacks detailed comparisons.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is perceived as pricey but provides strong ROI through its comprehensive toolset, efficient development time reduction, and productivity boost. It offers a free community version, enhancing its appeal. OpenText Functional Testing's pricing is higher, especially with concurrent and user licenses, yet offers competitive advantages through its sophisticated feature set. Visual Studio’s community version offers a more cost-effective entry point.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
The price is expensive.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 0.9% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
