We performed a comparison between Visual Studio Test Professional and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The debugging feature is valuable."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"What I found most valuable in Worksoft Certify is its identification feature. I also found its automation feature valuable."
"The tool is easy to use. It is a drag and drop Microsoft type of solution."
"We have been able to save on a lot of manual work for some very high skilled, expensive resources. This has been able to free up a significant amount of their time so they can spend more time on innovation and more creative, value-add activities. That's been one of the more rewarding things that we've done, and the most appreciated."
"The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers."
"People focus on what they actually want to test and define it in a more detailed way. It shines a light on what they are testing, along with the speed and adaptability."
"It is a huge improvement, as it recognizes complex general applications, where most tools won't recognize the objects within them."
"The turn around time for getting the automation tester familiarized with the tool is very quick, as it doesn't have any coding. It is fairly simple to understand."
"Improvement means for us that we have to be better in quality. Due to automation, you can run every automated test case twice a week. If you do it manually, you do it once per release. This is a quality improvement."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The data flow can be improved."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"The performance could be faster."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"Worksoft Certify's tech support's response time could be improved."
"It is poor for a web based application."
"I would like the GUI to be more user-friendly and intuitive. We want to be able to move assets from project to another project without having to be in the same project or the same folder structure."
"The problem with Worksoft Certify is that it's not always stable. It runs on a live platform that's constantly changing, so the test script needs to be adjusted every time, which is very painful."
"The technical support has been good, but sometimes there are little delays. A lot of times when we need support, it's an emergency situation."
"The product had some UI issues."
"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications."
"The overall speed and performance of this solution could be improved. In a future release, it would be useful to be able to do API testing."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 64 reviews. Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio and Panaya Test Dynamix. See our Visual Studio Test Professional vs. Worksoft Certify report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.