Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Pure Storage FlashArray Logo

Pure Storage FlashArray Reviews

Vendor: Pure Storage
4.6 out of 5

What is Pure Storage FlashArray?

Featured Pure Storage FlashArray reviews

Pure Storage FlashArray mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashArray in the All-Flash Storage category stands at 6.6%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
All-Flash Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pure Storage FlashArray6.6%
Dell PowerStore16.5%
HPE Alletra Storage9.9%
Other67.0%
All-Flash Storage

PeerResearch reports based on Pure Storage FlashArray reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryAll-Flash StorageAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPure Storage FlashArray vs Dell PowerStoreAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPure Storage FlashArray vs NetApp AFFAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPure Storage FlashArray vs HPE Alletra StorageAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dell PowerStore4.316.5%96%120 interviewsAdd to research
Pure FlashArray X NVMe4.50.9%100%36 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business50
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise107
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business1196
Midsize Enterprise790
Large Enterprise2631
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
5%
Retailer
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%

Compare Pure Storage FlashArray with alternative products

Learn more about Pure Storage FlashArray

Pure Storage FlashArray customers

Related questions

 
Pure Storage FlashArray Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Works at a consultancy with self employed4.0I managed Pure Storage for clients in various sectors, appreciating its support and analytics. However, it needs better compliance certifications. Although initially expensive, it becomes cost-effective long-term. NetApp offers better scalability, but Pure Storage remains reliable and user-friendly.
Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0We adopted Pure Storage FlashArray for its compelling technology, consolidating storage and enhancing performance tenfold with a small footprint. Its seamless upgrades and security features improved our operations, though automatic provisioning and replication scheduling need enhancement.
Presales Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0As an implementation engineer for Pure Storage FlashArray in Kazakhstan, I find that Remote Assist and cloud-based log collection are valuable features. However, the limited offline instruments can be a drawback for organizations with security concerns, particularly when compared to competitors like Huawei.
Senior System / Security Architect at a wellness & fitness company with 11-50 employees4.0I primarily work with small and medium-sized businesses and chose Pure Storage FlashArray for its exceptional performance and reliability. Though the interface lacks fine-tuning controls and support has declined, it remains the core of our infrastructure due to microsecond response times.
Senior Storage Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Pure Storage FlashArray to manage storage and DR sites due to its speed, insane compression, and ease of use. Its user-friendly interface is a game-changer compared to IBM, Infinidat, and Dell, despite needing better administrative control and API options.
Lead Technical Architect at ePlus Technology, inc.4.5I find Pure Storage FlashArray versatile, especially for virtualization and AI workloads. Its Flash architecture and Pure One analytics platform are valuable, though it needs better object storage support. Compared to competitors, it offers significant cost savings and improved throughput.
Lead System Analyst at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees4.5I primarily use Pure Storage FlashArray for SQL and Oracle databases, valuing features like Direct FlashArray and Pure1 management. It's easier to manage compared to Dell EMC, offering significant ROI with reduced staff requirements, though improved forecasting reports would help.
IT Admin at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.5We use Pure Storage FlashArray to enhance client storage solutions, leveraging NVMe technology for high IOPS and easy access, despite a higher cost. Its efficiency provides ROI, outperforming our previous systems like NetApp and EMC for larger datasets.