| Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech | 4.0 | I utilize Microsoft Purview Information Protection for comprehensive data discovery, classification, and protection. It integrates seamlessly with existing tools, offering cost-effective solutions via an E5 license, though improvements in response time and structured data classification are needed. |
| Director Security Architecture at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.0 | I found Microsoft Purview Information Protection useful for easy DLP configuration and data protection, but it struggles with false positives and inconsistent policy enforcement. It meets security objectives but lacks ROI benefits and needs improvement in accuracy and compatibility. |
| Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade | 3.5 | I initially used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for Office 365 and later expanded to Azure SQL and Power BI. While beneficial for integration and ROI, the auto-classification and product communication need improvement. Microsoft's ecosystem integration influenced my choice over alternatives. |
| Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Purview Information Protection mainly for sensitivity labeling, which simplifies policy enforcement, though limitations in AI classification, scalability, and occasional instability hinder efficiency; setup and licensing are also confusing, but overall, it integrates well within our Microsoft ecosystem. |
| Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for sensitivity labeling, which applies policies automatically, though its AI-driven classification isn't precise enough. It's promising but unstable at times, hard to scale, and has confusing pricing and deployment processes. |
| Technical Services Manager, Cloud at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection primarily for document labeling, appreciating its automated controls and integration with our tools, though AI classification and dictionary features need improvement; overall, it enhances our data security and compliance. |
| CEO at Blue Cycle | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Purview Information Protection to support Copilot readiness, valuing its broad sensitivity labeling and integration capabilities, though limited APIs hinder automation; overall, it's effective for securing data and enabling confident AI use in hybrid environments. |
| Program Manager, Worldwide at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection to prevent data leakage and appreciate its classification and eDiscovery features, though licensing complexity and AI label integration need improvement; overall, it's reliable, scalable, and valuable despite support and setup challenges. |