| Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I've found Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reliable for securing sensitive data, especially for clients pursuing compliance. It offers strong controls, improved with E5 add-ons, though I'd like faster rule syncing and more robust reporting features. |
| Director, IT Infrastructure at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I've found Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention highly effective for data classification, tagging, and compliance, especially within M365. It's reliable, easy to use, and adds great value, though improved implementation guidance would be appreciated. |
| Cloud Architecture Lead at bolder inc | 4.5 | I've used Microsoft Purview DLP for three years, finding it reliable and effective at preventing data leaks without hindering productivity. It's easy to deploy, scales well, integrates naturally with Microsoft tools, and support has been excellent. |
| Director of Cyber Security | 3.0 | I've found Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention useful for email data exfiltration prevention, offering quick alerts on potential breaches, though dealing with false positives is challenging. It enhances our security posture, but quantifying financial ROI remains difficult. |
| Head of Geographies; Data Protection Officer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for over five years to prevent accidental data leaks, and it’s been effective, scalable, and stable, with strong support and AI-driven features that enhance data classification and policy enforcement. |
| Staff Systems Administrator at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for five years to classify sensitive data, finding its automatic tagging and eDiscovery features helpful, though setup and document tracking can be messy, and stability occasionally inconsistent. |
| Co-Owner and Principal Consultant at BriComp Computers | 4.0 | I've found Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention effective for safeguarding sensitive data, with reliable automation, good scalability, and strong discovery features, though setup was initially challenging and support response times could be faster. |
| Security Engineer at baseVISION | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for six years, mainly for preventing data exfiltration. It's effective, scalable, and provides strong visibility, though policy propagation could be faster; overall, it integrates well within Microsoft's ecosystem. |
