Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft

3.9 out of 5

21 reviews
91% willing to recommend

187 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's auto-labeling boosts data management, with seamless integration into Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365 reducing insider threat response times. Enhancements like OCR and IDM ensure compliance, though sensitive label setup is challenging. Lacks Linux support, but bolsters data security posture management. AI-enabling setup wizards would ease the setup. Classification issues arise with Oracle integration, with technical support needing improvement for full utilization.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's auto-labeling feature efficiently labels documents across Outlook, Exchange, SharePoint, and OneDrive.

It effectively reduces time to action on insider threats through seamless integration with Azure and other Microsoft services.

Compliance capabilities are robust with features like legal hold, sensitive data identification, and policy customization beneficial for target audiences.

It improves compliance confidence by managing data effectively and issuing alerts to prevent unauthorized data leaks.

The combination of IDM, EDM, and DCM features enhances data leak prevention, complemented by sensitivity labels and data security posture management.

CONS

There is ambiguity in setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels, which presents a learning curve for new users.

The platform lacks integration with third-party source codes and databases, leading to challenges in classification and labeling outside Microsoft documents.

Support for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is criticized as poor, and AI advancements are needed to improve false positive rates.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention does not support AIP for Linux systems and lacks libraries for Python.

Licensing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is considered expensive, impacting overall satisfaction with the tool.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros review quotes

IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank

Jul 26, 2023

I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2020164

Cyber Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 11, 2022

Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.

Read full review

JH

Sr. Lead Consultant at catapult

May 13, 2021

The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas.

Read full review

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1964613

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 26, 2024

When you are going to use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, most of the setup is already done by default as per your needs.

Read full review

Solution Architect : Corporate wide systems at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 11, 2023

One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.

Read full review

reviewer2271795

System Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 25, 2024

The solution's most valuable feature is the mature O365 DLP, which works with SharePoint and Teams.

Read full review

Abdulkadir AKGUN

Senior Cloud Solutions Consultant. MW and Security at Data Market

Aug 12, 2024

The tool's most valuable feature is in the area of OCR.

Read full review

Senior technical consultant at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 28, 2023

The product can block the uploads to cloud services.

Read full review

President at RidixLab

May 19, 2023

The product is easy to configure.

Read full review

CEO at OmniNet Systems

Apr 11, 2022

There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 21)

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons review quotes

IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank

Jul 26, 2023

They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing.

Read full review

reviewer2020164

Cyber Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 11, 2022

There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.

Read full review

JH

Sr. Lead Consultant at catapult

May 13, 2021

There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great.

Read full review

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1964613

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 26, 2024

All the security operations are better defined in Forcepoint, while in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, you will have to use a specific workflow and then an application to release blocked emails.

Read full review

Solution Architect : Corporate wide systems at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 11, 2023

A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that.

Read full review

reviewer2271795

System Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 25, 2024

A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting.

Read full review

Abdulkadir AKGUN

Senior Cloud Solutions Consultant. MW and Security at Data Market

Aug 12, 2024

The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic.

Read full review

Senior technical consultant at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 28, 2023

The support is poor.

Read full review

President at RidixLab

May 19, 2023

The solution should provide better integration with other systems.

Read full review

CEO at OmniNet Systems

Apr 11, 2022

Technical support is awful.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 21)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Microsoft Security Suite

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Digital Guardian vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

GitGuardian Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Code42 Incydr vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Safetica ONE vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Trellix DLP vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Microsoft Security Suite

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Digital Guardian vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

GitGuardian Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Code42 Incydr vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Safetica ONE vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Trellix DLP vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

See all alternatives

Related questions

195

Which solution do you prefer: Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, or Microsoft Purview DLP?

10

How to minimize false positives for PII and PCI around different data systems across the globe?

47

Symantec Endpoint vs. McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection: Technical Comparison Between Data Loss Protection Solutions

377

When should companies use SSL Inspection?

47

What software solution would you recommend to monitor user machines?

241

What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?

31

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

24

Endpoint DLP for Mac Network

27

Best alternatives to Digital Guardian for data protection?

1,205

What is Cognitive Cybersecurity and what is it used for?