Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews

Name: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Brand: Cisco
Rating: 4.1 (119 reviews)

Vendor: Cisco

4.1 out of 5

119 reviews
92% willing to recommend

2,822 followers

Start review

What is Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Get the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and more!

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is the #4 ranked solution in top Wireless LAN solutions. PeerSpot users give Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most commonly compared to Aruba Wireless: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 53% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

May 2025

Get the report

Helped 853,960 peers since 2012

Featured Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

RezaPradipta

Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk

The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…

Read full review

Mageshwaran S

Solution Architect at Bharti Airtel ·

Meraki is far better than any other wireless solution. It is pretty easy to use. I can control any number of sites globally with a lean IT team. The product provides visibility into what the users are accessing. I can see where they are connected, what kind of traffic they are running, and why they face issues. The product has mesh, MIMO, and BLE. I can use the location tracker, too. I can also integrate Air Marshal to reduce interference. Before the site is ready, I can configure the virtual environment. When the site is ready, I need to sync it up with the cloud. All the configurations will be live within three minutes. I can go live within a day. I can do the third day’s job directly on the first day. I don't have any bottlenecks when I need to upgrade my wireless controllers. If I had an on-premise product that went down due to a power outage or natural calamities, restoring it would be very hectic. I would have to pay for a virtual license and add a server. If I put it on the cloud, I need to pay a huge amount for the egress cost, whether it is AWS or Azure. If it is in the Meraki cloud, I do not need to pay anything, and everything is under control. Even if the cloud goes down, it will not affect my productivity. The solution’s performance is much better than that of the other OEMs.

Read full review

MIGUEL ANGELFERNANDEZ

Consultant at Markit Spain

Cisco had a significant share of the market, but it's lost some of it. It initially led in LAN, but now it faces strong competition. Fortinet has become a major competitor in Spain, particularly in terms of pricing, making it attractive across various industries. Cisco is a bit pricey and has lost ground in LAN applications and policy management. When combining Cisco with Forescout and Aruba, Forescout is superior to Aruba and Cisco in terms of NAC, control, and office environments. However, Aruba performs better than Cisco in control and office settings. Cisco's use of RADIUS can be quite complex to maintain and install. If customers have strong radio performance and robust network access control, Cisco is a strong choice for connectivity and straightforward deployment. However, if a customer wants a comprehensive solution that includes security, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, they should consider competitors who offer a more global solution. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in the Wireless LAN category stands at 12.6%, up from 12.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Wireless LAN	Jun 2, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jun 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless	Jun 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless	Jun 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless	Jun 2, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Aruba Wireless	4.2	16.5%	86%	148 interviews Add to research
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points	4.3	5.8%	100%	20 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers centralized cloud management, easy deployment, and high security. Users find value in its intuitive dashboard for monitoring and reporting, seamless integration with different network components, flexibility, and the ease of configuration. Features such as multiple SSID support, traffic analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and remote management solutions enhance operational efficiency, making it suitable for various organizational sizes and requirements.

"I would recommend Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN simply because of the ease of deployment and its reliability."
"The setup phase was very easy and user-friendly for me, not only for initial setup but also for ongoing management."
"It only comes with a controller on the cloud, and this differentiator simplifies network management."

Room for Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN faces critique regarding limited features and customization compared to competitors. Users express concerns about high pricing, license restrictions, and complex setup processes. They seek improvements in logging, support, and integration with other Cisco products. Requests include enhanced technical capabilities, additional security features, advanced routing, and scalability for larger enterprises. Users also desire enhancements in user-friendliness, pricing transparency, and more comprehensive support for IoT and WiFi 6. Improvements in data granularity and guest connectivity are also sought.

"The stability could be better. We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network."
"The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."
"The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."

ROI

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN delivers a positive return through reduced support costs, effective resource management, and easy installation. While the device is mid-range in pricing, it can generate revenue particularly for hospitality sectors. Some users experience cost savings from transport and admin by leveraging its analytics to optimize bandwidth expenses. Although high initial costs are noted, its value lies in reporting features and usability. Users generally see returns within three to five years.

Pricing

Enterprise users find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing high but commensurate with the quality and stable functionality it offers. Licensing requires annual renewal, with available terms varying from one to five years, directly impacting costs. Negotiable deal options are advised due to the potentially prohibitive long-term expense. While some users highlight the need for better licensing flexibility, others appreciate the solution's strong features. Initial acquisition costs are attractive, but renewal discounts are sparse, rendering prices challenging for some markets.

"The solution's pricing is a little higher."
"It could be more affordable than other solutions."
"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for various applications, including offering Wi-Fi access to employees and guests, facilitating secure internet connections, managing IoT devices, and supporting educational infrastructure. They implement it in diverse settings such as schools, hospitals, offices, and retail environments. Users appreciate its ease of deployment, cloud management capabilities, and security features. It supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, making it versatile for companies ranging from small businesses to enterprise-level operations.

Service and Support

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customer service is generally rated positively, with users finding it efficient and accessible. Technical support receives mixed feedback; many users find it responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful, while some mention inconsistency in handling complex issues and occasional delays. The ease of reaching tech support through multiple channels, combined with the availability of comprehensive documentation, is appreciated. However, improvements in first-level support skills and language options are suggested.

Deployment

Many describe Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's initial setup as easy, straightforward, and user-friendly, particularly for those familiar with the portal interface. It often takes a short time, ranging from a few minutes to a few days, depending on project scale and customer needs. While most find the setup seamless, some situations require more expertise or guidance. Despite potential complexities, many praise the ease of deployment and management once configured.

Scalability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely recognized for its high scalability, accommodating various user counts and business sizes. Users emphasize its simple expansion capabilities, supported by cloud-based management and licensing. Some mention challenges related to licensing costs and hardware limitations in large deployments, but many appreciate its ease of scaling across multiple locations and devices. While a minority express reservations about ultimate scalability, most users are satisfied with its ability to grow with their needs.

Stability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN demonstrates high stability for most users, with minimal disruptions or issues. Hardware issues are rare, although some users experience minor network lags or occasional disruptions related to internet dependency. Users appreciate its robust performance and cloud-based management, rating it highly. While a few users have faced challenges with older equipment or peak usage, most find Cisco Meraki a reliable and well-performing choice for their wireless needs.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Government

Retailer

Healthcare Company

University

Construction Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Legal Firm

Non Profit

Energy/Utilities Company

Media Company

Insurance Company

Hospitality Company

Outsourcing Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Performing Arts

Transportation Company

Consumer Goods Company

Engineering Company

Logistics Company

Compare Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN with alternative products

Learn more about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was previously known as MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins