Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.
Get the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and more!
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is the #3 ranked solution in top Wireless LAN solutions. PeerSpot users give Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most commonly compared to Aruba Wireless: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 50% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 881,346 peers since 2012

Featured Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

Read more reviews

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN mindshare

As of February 2026, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in the Wireless LAN category stands at 10.3%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN10.3%
Aruba Wireless13.4%
Ruckus Wireless12.4%
Other63.9%
Wireless LAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless LANFeb 1, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 1, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus WirelessFeb 1, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba WirelessFeb 1, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco WirelessFeb 1, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Aruba Wireless4.213.4%87%150 interviewsAdd to research
Ruckus Wireless4.312.4%95%105 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers centralized cloud management, excellent reporting, and ease of deployment. Users appreciate the dashboard for monitoring and configuring networks remotely, providing great flexibility for IT teams. The simplicity of the interface, compatibility with various devices, and robust performance are highlighted. Its security features, such as application visibility and Layer 7 protections, enhance its value. Meraki's user-friendly and scalable nature makes it suitable for various organizational sizes.
  • "Configuring network policies remotely for Cisco Meraki Wireless is very useful for an organization that has many branches, as I can manage it centrally from the Meraki dashboard without having to drive to a location, even if it is 100 or more kilometers away."
  • "With the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN system, it can be shipped as new to any location, connected to the network, and the rest will come up automatically from the cloud interface."
  • "The best features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN include the excellent reporting; the dashboard reporting aids us a lot in troubleshooting issues, and the platform is very robust."

Room for Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve its logging, Layer-7 capabilities, radio features, support, and user management. It would benefit from enhanced security, compliance, service management integration, and customization. Pricing adjustments, user interface improvements, and better licensing terms would be advantageous. Expanding integration with third-party apps, simplifying the setup, addressing downtime during license expiration, and extending Wi-Fi 6 support could enhance functionality. Coverage, scalability, and advanced enterprise features also need enhancement for broader adoption.
  • "There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system."
  • "The stability could be better. We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network."
  • "The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."

ROI

Customers report varying results with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN regarding ROI. Some experience significant savings on transport and staffing costs while enjoying enhanced analytics and internet utilization monitoring. Others cite high capital and licensing expenses, questioning its value for larger businesses. Many benefit from simplified management, valuable reporting features, and cost-effective components compared to competitors. ROI tends to manifest within three to five years, making it appealing for certain small businesses.

Pricing

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is priced on a subscription basis, with licensing often tied to contract lengths of one, three, or five years. Setup costs can vary, and hardware expenses for a single access point can reach $1,200. Although offering quality features, the solution is seen as expensive by many users compared to competitors like Aruba and Ruckus. Negotiation can help mitigate costs, but the licensing model is a common concern due to its inflexibility.
  • "The solution's pricing is a little higher."
  • "It could be more affordable than other solutions."
  • "The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely employed for providing Wi-Fi access in various environments, including offices, retail, education, and healthcare. It supports user and guest access and is favored for ease of deployment, management, and security features. Many resellers and integrators implement it for diverse organizational needs, such as network connectivity, troubleshooting, and IoT device management. Additionally, its cloud-based management is a significant advantage for centralized control across multiple locations.

Service and Support

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's customer service is often praised, providing prompt assistance. Technical support is generally good, with knowledgeable staff and quick response times, although some users experience delays or inconsistent help. Some find the support "hit or miss" and mention that basic support lacks depth. The ability to resolve issues effectively varies, with some complaints about the clarity of information provided. The system's documentation is comprehensive, aiding users before contacting tech support.

Deployment

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's initial setup is often described as easy and intuitive, requiring minimal time and configuration. Many users highlight its plug-and-play capability and straightforward deployment. While some found certain installations complex, most agree a few assistance and planning suffice. It's praised for simplicity, allowing even those with minimal technical expertise to manage effectively. Setup time largely varies depending on project scale, ranging from minutes to a few days.

Scalability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely considered scalable. Many users report seamless scaling for diverse environments and organizations with vast users. It's often praised for ease of expansion due to its cloud-based nature, though licensing costs pose challenges for some. Users appreciate its adaptability for medium to large organizations, with easy integration for additional access points. Some find it less scalable due to limitations on device numbers, but overall, it efficiently supports various business needs.

Stability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN demonstrates high stability according to various users. Most have had few issues, with some noting its reliability during peak usage and extensive deployments. Occasional problems cited include firmware update challenges and network saturation. While some APs encountered peer connectivity issues, the system's cloud-based architecture supports robust performance. A handful of users experienced glitches during internet disruptions, but Meraki's reputation for being dependable remains largely positive among users.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business64
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business571
Midsize Enterprise305
Large Enterprise883
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
6%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
4%
Construction Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was previously known as MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Related questions

  • 186
Can Cisco Meraki and Cisco Wireless work in the same environment?
  • 211
What is the biggest difference between Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless?
  • 376
What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
  • 14
How does Cisco Meraki solution perform for Voice and SD-WAN?
  • 19
How different are the pricing and costs of Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 25
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 160
What are the differences between Cisco Meraki MX67 and FortiGate 60?
  • 22
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 45
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 20
Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Wireless LAN

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Omada Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Omada Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Mist AI and Cloud vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Mist AI and Cloud vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
D-Link Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
D-Link Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
ExtremeWireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
ExtremeWireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
See all alternatives
 
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Network Architect at Previder4.0Cisco Meraki Wireless is easy to manage remotely, offers useful analytics and centralized auditing, and integrates well with Cisco products, though not third-party ones. I rate it an 8, despite limited security opinions and some technical support issues.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees5.0I’ve used Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for eight years and find it stable, secure, and easy to deploy, with excellent remote management and reporting features, competitive pricing, and responsive support—making it ideal for our MSP environment.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees4.5In our nonprofit organization, we upgraded from outdated Cisco access points to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, appreciating the centralized control and ability to manage all access points from one dashboard. Recent improvements include new wireless protocols and stronger antennas, enhancing performance.
Solution Architect at airtel4.5I use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for office infrastructure and IoT, finding it intuitive and offering excellent control and visibility. However, it's best for small to medium businesses, as it struggles with scalability for larger enterprises.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk4.0I primarily use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for enterprise and guest Wi-Fi, especially in the retail sector. Its cloud-based management offers streamlined control of wireless devices and security clients, though improving uplink limitations could enhance competitiveness and user experience.
Chief Technologies Officer at ASTORG PARTNERS4.0I've used Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for five years and find its cloud-managed, plug-and-play setup very convenient. It's stable, scalable, easy to configure, and integrates well across locations, though occasional update issues arise.
Strategie, Innovazione e Customer Experience – Analytics & Customer Experience (CEX) Manager at Telecom Italia4.0I find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN valuable for its centralized security management, simplifying network security. However, the management tools require improvement. There are no specific deployment details or consideration of other solutions mentioned in the review.
Consultant at Markit Spain3.5In reviewing Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, I find that while it excels in cloud solutions and open APIs, it needs improvements in multi-tenant speed and graphics. Although Cisco surpasses Aruba in bandwidth efficiency, Ruckus leads in radio signaling.