Azure Red Hat OpenShift Reviews

Azure Red Hat OpenShift pricing is perceived as flexible and competitive by some users who value bargaining opportunities, especially for newcomers. However, it is generally considered expensive compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, with varied ratings for affordability. Pricing strategies can influence overall costs, which may include disaster recovery solutions requiring additional licensing. Companies should assess their strategic needs and explore direct purchasing options from Red Hat or the Azure portal for potential cost efficiencies.

• "Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal.Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."
• "I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
• "Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

Companies primarily use Azure Red Hat OpenShift for pipeline management, internal and external security, corporate integrations, containerized applications, and virtualization. They manage Kubernetes apps, facilitate cloud migration, and control user environments. Many deploy applications in a banking environment, on private clouds, or as IaaS. Clients utilize it for storing databases, application delivery, and virtualization platforms. It aids in migrating from on-premise systems to cloud environments, accommodating enterprise requirements like employee engagement applications and HR systems.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift's customer service varies in quality. Some users express frustration due to delays in response times, often caused by time zone differences. Ratings range from two to nine, illustrating discrepancies between different engagements. Some find technical support lacking, with delayed responses and minimal information, while others recognize strengths as a partner, especially with Red Hat products. Users often find deployment straightforward, facilitated by automation, though technical support ratings differ.

Many users found Azure Red Hat OpenShift's initial setup straightforward, especially with automated processes and configuration via an interface or YAML. A basic cluster setup takes under an hour, although complexity varies with the environment. Some face challenges with internal networks and Azure dependencies. Ratings range from six to ten, with hybrid cloud deployments seeing faster implementations. Users employ tools like Jenkins for CI/CD, while junior engineers can handle deployments easily.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers robust scalability with advanced automation features, such as cluster auto-scaling. It supports both horizontal and vertical scaling using pods, cores, and layers, making it versatile for various needs. Feedback indicates varied satisfaction levels, with some users rating it between eight to ten. It effectively scales resources based on demand, demonstrating its adaptability and efficiency in both large and diverse environments.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift is generally seen as stable, with users rating its stability between seven and ten. Issues encountered are typically minor, such as UI glitches and bugs, but are manageable. Prolonged production use shows no significant problems. Stability receives high marks, with multiple users praising its reliability. Though there is room for improvement according to some ratings, the platform is considered robust due to long-standing performance, especially in enterprise environments.