Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 0.6% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 10 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

510 Views
495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

476 Views
476 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are platforms in the scalable and secure application management category. Azure Red Hat OpenShift seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides strong security, easy integration with IBM services, and effective compliance features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers extensive integration options within Azure's ecosystem, powerful monitoring and analytics tools, and a complete application delivery platform with high-level automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud could enhance its feature set, expand integration opportunities beyond IBM, and improve analytics tools. Azure Red Hat OpenShift might reduce initial investment requirements, simplify its extensive feature suite for easier adoption, and enhance its support for multi-cloud deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud offers straightforward deployment with ample support resources for IBM users. Azure Red Hat OpenShift features a streamlined deployment process backed by Microsoft's comprehensive support network, favoring users with existing Microsoft integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud delivers cost-effectiveness with lower setup costs and favorable ROI for IBM-focused enterprises. Azure Red Hat OpenShift requires a higher initial investment but offers enhanced ROI through advanced features and integrations, appealing to users valuing its powerful capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

ArtemiiKropachev

Vice President, Engineering & Principal Architect at Li9 Technology Solutions

A high-performing solution provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand and lot of automation that developers can utilize

Azure Red Hat OpenShift is very valuable because it is a complete application delivery platform with a lot of automation that developers can utilize. It's a complete solution without building your own on top of Kubernetes. As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"The product is expensive."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"Automation could be improved."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretati...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 47% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 20% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 38% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2025

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

July 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.