Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo

Top 10 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Alternatives

Vendor: Trellix
4.0 out of 5
2,371 followers
Start review

Top Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Wazuh. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat detection, AI-driven analytics, and seamless integration, ensuring comprehensive protection, real-time response, and simplified management to safeguard enterprise environments effectively.

Trellix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trellix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in centralized management, ideal for enterprises seeking integrated security solutions. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers strong threat detection and near-instant protection, preferred for real-time analytics and cloud-native benefits, making it attractive to tech buyers prioritizing threat analysis.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost but offers robust initial features, while CrowdStrike Falcon boasts a lower setup cost with a focus on streamlined implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost but offers robust initial features, while CrowdStrike Falcon boasts a lower setup cost with a focus on streamlined implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in centralized management and customizable security solutions, ideal for adaptable needs. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates smoothly with Microsoft products, offering seamless protection, appealing to Microsoft-centric environments with its robust integration and comprehensive tools.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform tends to have higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more economical setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform tends to have higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more economical setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Trellix offers advanced threat prevention, centralized management, and encryption, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive security. In comparison, Wazuh attracts those seeking cost-effective security monitoring with features like log monitoring and file integrity, ideal for budget-conscious organizations preferring open-source solutions.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Wazuh Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves higher setup costs than Wazuh, which offers a more budget-friendly solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves higher setup costs than Wazuh, which offers a more budget-friendly solution.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security focuses on centralized management and strong DLP features. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes easy deployment and integration with its ecosystem. Trellix suits those needing adaptive threat protection, while Fortinet appeals with advanced threat management within a consolidated framework.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a larger initial setup investment, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a larger initial setup investment, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Trellix offers a comprehensive solution with centralized control over endpoint features, appealing for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection with self-learning abilities, offering rapid responses and customization options.
Download Darktrace vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves significant setup costs, whereas Darktrace offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves significant setup costs, whereas Darktrace offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers central management and integration for a comprehensive security view. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides advanced AI and automated responses. Trellix's pricing delivers significant ROI, while SentinelOne offers robust protection justifying its higher cost.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Complete, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Complete, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers centralized management with features like antivirus and encryption. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR excels in integration with Microsoft services, providing enhanced threat analytics. Tech buyers might choose Trellix for adaptability, while Defender XDR appeals to Microsoft ecosystem users.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a competitive setup cost advantage, while Microsoft Defender XDR is often recognized for its straightforward initial configuration. Users may consider these factors when evaluating their deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a competitive setup cost advantage, while Microsoft Defender XDR is often recognized for its straightforward initial configuration. Users may consider these factors when evaluating their deployment options.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in central management and diverse feature support. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection with behavioral analytics. Trellix is ideal for those requiring centralized control, while Cortex XDR suits those focusing on threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a low setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a low setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in real-time data correlation and offers robust user behavior analytics. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security provides strong threat protection with customization capabilities. QRadar needs better device integration, while Trellix requires improved resource management and authentication tool integration.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
IBM Security QRadar has higher initial setup costs, offering robust features tailored for enterprise security, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations prioritizing cost-effectiveness with reliable endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has higher initial setup costs, offering robust features tailored for enterprise security, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations prioritizing cost-effectiveness with reliable endpoint protection.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform focuses on data protection with a centralized management console. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes network security and VPN access. A tech buyer might choose Trellix for integration features, while Fortinet offers cost-effective multi-layered security.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost initially, whereas Fortinet FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly setup. Trellix provides robust advanced features, contrasting with FortiClient's efficient security essentials approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost initially, whereas Fortinet FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly setup. Trellix provides robust advanced features, contrasting with FortiClient's efficient security essentials approach.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in centralized management, data protection, and integration flexibility, suitable for organizations prioritizing security infrastructure integration. In comparison, Elastic Security's open-source platform offers customization and cost-effectiveness, appealing to businesses valuing adaptability and advanced data analysis.
Download Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Elastic Security offers a more flexible installation, potentially impacting initial expenses but offering added configuration options. The setup of each platform distinctly influences pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Elastic Security offers a more flexible installation, potentially impacting initial expenses but offering added configuration options. The setup of each platform distinctly influences pricing.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix excels in comprehensive customer support and proactive defense through analytics. In comparison, HP Wolf Security focuses on isolation and threat containment with minimal customer service reliance, appealing to those prioritizing simplicity and self-sufficiency. Each offers diverse benefits based on organizational needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has straightforward setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a feature-rich installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has straightforward setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a feature-rich installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers a cost-effective, stable solution with robust network protection and diverse features. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides advanced, customizable functionalities, focusing on integration with SIEM and data classification, appealing to those desiring comprehensive security despite a higher resource demand.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a moderate setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is noted for its cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a moderate setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is noted for its cost-effectiveness.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Trellix offers centralized management and integration with DLP and encryption features. In comparison, Tanium excels in inventory and patch management. Trellix provides efficient on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, whereas Tanium offers responsive support, favoring on-premises control and infrastructure.
Download Tanium vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Tanium involves a significantly higher initial investment, potentially offering more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Tanium involves a significantly higher initial investment, potentially offering more advanced features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat protection with centralized management, ideal for large enterprises seeking comprehensive security features. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security provides cost-effective, multilayered protection, suitable for SMBs focusing on budget-friendly options with efficient customer service.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs higher setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs higher setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is more budget-friendly.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ideal for cost-sensitive environments due to its affordability, strong virtual patching, and ease of endpoint management. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform appeals to complex infrastructures with its integration capabilities and robust DLP, offering high flexibility at a higher price.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more flexible pricing structure. Trellix emphasizes rapid deployment, while Trend focuses on scalable implementation for diverse environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more flexible pricing structure. Trellix emphasizes rapid deployment, while Trend focuses on scalable implementation for diverse environments.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET provides comprehensive threat protection with efficient resource use, low RAM and CPU needs, and a clear management console. In comparison, Trellix emphasizes advanced threat intelligence and integration. Each solution offers distinct benefits, catering to various organizational needs and expertise levels.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is straightforward and transparent, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost can be higher due to complex configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is straightforward and transparent, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost can be higher due to complex configurations.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trellix excels in centralized management and security integration, appealing to those managing large environments. In comparison, Trend Vision One is ideal for robust threat detection and compatibility with the public cloud. Trellix's hybrid deployment offers flexibility, while Trend Vision One's modular pricing enhances ROI.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Vision One Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while Trend Vision One presents a higher setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while Trend Vision One presents a higher setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Trellix excels in centralized management with advanced threat protection integration, supporting multiple platforms. In comparison, Intercept X emphasizes machine learning and ransomware protection, offering intuitive management. Trellix suits environments needing varied platform support, while Intercept X offers affordability with proactive protection.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight variable setup costs, while Intercept X Endpoint reviews point to straightforward and cost-effective implementation. Key differences in setup complexity and cost are noted between the two endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight variable setup costs, while Intercept X Endpoint reviews point to straightforward and cost-effective implementation. Key differences in setup complexity and cost are noted between the two endpoint security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides intuitive setup with real-time protection, ideal for simplicity and quick ROI. In comparison, BigFix offers scalable patch management and software distribution, suitable for enterprises needing robust security and extensive management with long-term investment benefits.
Download BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often involves a higher setup cost, whereas BigFix typically offers a more cost-effective setup. These differences highlight the distinct financial considerations for organizations evaluating each security platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often involves a higher setup cost, whereas BigFix typically offers a more cost-effective setup. These differences highlight the distinct financial considerations for organizations evaluating each security platform.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers advanced threat prevention and centralized management, appealing for enterprise deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in integration and threat detection, making it ideal for sophisticated responses. Trellix may require resource optimization, while Cisco could improve AI integration.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is higher compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is higher compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers seamless integration features and competitive pricing, making it appealing for comprehensive protection needs. In comparison, Forescout Platform excels in network access control, ideal for diverse device environments, though its cost may suit medium to large enterprises better.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform features a low setup cost, offering cost-effective initial implementation. Forescout Platform, on the other hand, incurs a higher setup cost, which might be justified by its extensive suite of advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform features a low setup cost, offering cost-effective initial implementation. Forescout Platform, on the other hand, incurs a higher setup cost, which might be justified by its extensive suite of advanced features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Trellix excels in central management and seamless integration, ideal for enterprises needing detailed control. In comparison, Check Point Harmony prioritizes comprehensive protection with tools like SandBlast. Trellix's ease of deployment contrasts with Check Point's reliability, presenting varied benefits based on organizational needs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup is straightforward with competitive costs, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a more involved setup process, reflecting in its pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup is straightforward with competitive costs, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a more involved setup process, reflecting in its pricing.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust central management with diverse endpoint protection, ideal for enterprises needing extensive control. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR excels in threat intelligence and user behavior analytics, providing faster threat identification and cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more costly setup with extended implementation time while Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker, more economical deployment. Trellix users note complexity, whereas Rapid7 users appreciate its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more costly setup with extended implementation time while Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker, more economical deployment. Trellix users note complexity, whereas Rapid7 users appreciate its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security focuses on integration and centralized management for advanced threat predictions, appealing to those prioritizing device management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black offers extensive threat visibility and prevention, attracting enterprises needing real-time data for identifying emerging threats.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive advantages in setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides a more complex installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive advantages in setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides a more complex installation process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in centralized management and advanced containment, making it ideal for those needing stable, scalable systems. In comparison, Cynet offers comprehensive protection with user behavior analysis and automated threat detection, appealing to buyers seeking ease of use and robust endpoint security.
Download Cynet vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are higher than Cynet, which provides a more affordable pricing structure. Cynet offers a clear competitive edge with its cost-effectiveness in the initial setup phase compared to Trellix.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are higher than Cynet, which provides a more affordable pricing structure. Cynet offers a clear competitive edge with its cost-effectiveness in the initial setup phase compared to Trellix.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels with its ePolicy Orchestrator for seamless operation and scalability in large environments. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is noted for its integrated threat detection and automatic updates, offering cost-effective solutions for comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which is favored for its more predictable pricing model. Trellix users highlight adaptability, while Bitdefender users appreciate cost-effectiveness and straightforward implementa...
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which is favored for its more predictable pricing model. Trellix users highlight adaptability, while Bitdefender users appreciate cost-effectiveness and straightforward implementa...
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in centralized management with features like DLP and encryption. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems, targeting small to medium enterprises. Trellix suits flexible deployments, while Defender emphasizes seamless Microsoft integration.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight a streamlined setup process with flexible cost options, while Microsoft Defender for Business is noted for its competitive pricing structure and user-friendly deployment. Trellix offers comprehensive support, whereas Defender excels i...
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews highlight a streamlined setup process with flexible cost options, while Microsoft Defender for Business is noted for its competitive pricing structure and user-friendly deployment. Trellix offers comprehensive support, whereas Defender excels i...
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a wide range of features for threat prevention with centralized management, possibly appealing to those needing scalability. In comparison, Malwarebytes excels in malware detection, suitable for those prioritizing ease of use and quick deployment.
Download Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves a setup cost that users find significant, while Malwarebytes has a more competitive setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves a setup cost that users find significant, while Malwarebytes has a more competitive setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security attracts enterprises with central management and extensive features. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security appeals with robust user-focused protection like VPN and parental controls. Trellix suits large operations, while Bitdefender's simple deployment and affordability advantage diverse users.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which features a slightly higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs highlights their focus on different aspects of user security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which features a slightly higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs highlights their focus on different aspects of user security needs.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 appeals to budget-focused tech buyers with its real-time monitoring and ease of deployment. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's extensive features and comprehensive security architecture attract those prioritizing long-term ROI and advanced threat prevention across the platform.
Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a setup cost that is known for being lower, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform tends to have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting a difference in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a setup cost that is known for being lower, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform tends to have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting a difference in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security focuses on centralized management and advanced protection, benefiting organizations with customizable security features. In comparison, Cybereason excels in real-time threat detection with strong behavioral analytics, appealing to teams needing comprehensive detection and response capabilities.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making it a better choice for budget-conscious businesses. Cybereason, though pricier, might justify the cost with additional security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making it a better choice for budget-conscious businesses. Cybereason, though pricier, might justify the cost with additional security features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5
Trellix provides centralized management and adaptable threat prevention, ideal for large enterprises with extensive IT needs. In comparison, Norton focuses on usability with VPN and firewall protections, appealing to small businesses seeking straightforward security solutions.
Download Norton Small Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, which offers budget-friendly options. This difference can influence initial investment considerations when evaluating these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, which offers budget-friendly options. This difference can influence initial investment considerations when evaluating these endpoint security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in central management and flexibility, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive oversight. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is valued for lightweight design and advanced machine learning, making it ideal for seamless protection against zero-day threats.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in central management and integration, appealing to enterprises with diverse deployment options. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security is cost-effective and praised for its data loss protection, making it attractive to small and medium businesses.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup. Both solutions cater to distinct use cases within endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform involves a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup. Both solutions cater to distinct use cases within endpoint protection.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers centralized management with advanced protection, ideal for comprehensive endpoint security. In comparison, Digital Guardian emphasizes data security, providing strong classification and loss prevention, perfect for organizations with strict data protection requirements.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are competitive while Digital Guardian requires a more substantial initial investment. The differences in pricing emphasize Trellix's cost-effectiveness compared to Digital Guardian's higher entry price.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform setup costs are competitive while Digital Guardian requires a more substantial initial investment. The differences in pricing emphasize Trellix's cost-effectiveness compared to Digital Guardian's higher entry price.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in integration, user-friendly dashboards, and adaptive threat prevention; a tech buyer might prioritize efficient management. In comparison, ThreatLocker Zero Trust emphasizes blocking capabilities and robust controls, appealing to those focused on zero-trust models and enhanced security.
Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform may involve higher initial costs due to its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform may involve higher initial costs due to its advanced security features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security attracts tech buyers with comprehensive management via central control. In comparison, Deep Instinct's AI-driven threat detection appeals to those seeking high precision. Trellix offers flexible deployment, while Deep Instinct provides clear support. Pricing varies but both ensure valuable ROI.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a substantial setup cost, making it potentially less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is more competitively priced, offering a cost-effective setup that attracts businesses seeking budget-friendly solu...
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a substantial setup cost, making it potentially less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is more competitively priced, offering a cost-effective setup that attracts businesses seeking budget-friendly solu...
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust features and scalability, attracting buyers looking for centralized management and advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert provides efficient malware protection with a user-friendly approach, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly pricing and security reliability.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert features a more cost-heavy setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert features a more cost-heavy setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Trellix offers strong threat prevention and simple deployment, appealing to users who value cost efficiency and support responsiveness. In comparison, Mandiant Advantage, with its advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive security insights, is ideal for buyers needing detailed analysis and enhanced protection capabilities.
Download Mandiant Advantage vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Mandiant Advantage involves an initial cost, highlighting a key distinction in setup requirements between these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Mandiant Advantage involves an initial cost, highlighting a key distinction in setup requirements between these security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
Trellix offers advanced threat prevention and ePolicy Orchestrator for centralized management. In comparison, Trend Micro provides virtual patching and anti-malware protection for servers. Trellix excels in feature integration, while Trend Micro offers cost-effectiveness and superior support services, appealing to diverse tech buyers.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect, making it essential to evaluate budget constraints against security needs when considering which platform to implement for endpoint security.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect, making it essential to evaluate budget constraints against security needs when considering which platform to implement for endpoint security.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is comprehensive, offering robust features like DLP and centralized management. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone emphasizes ease of use and competitive pricing, appealing to tech buyers seeking efficient updates and integration flexibility with a focus on cost-effective solutions.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more straightforward setup process compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which may involve higher initial configuration effort. Bitdefender offers advanced customization options, while Trellix emphasizes ease of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more straightforward setup process compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which may involve higher initial configuration effort. Bitdefender offers advanced customization options, while Trellix emphasizes ease of implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Trellix excels in centralized management and offers extensive control across endpoints. In comparison, Webroot is lightweight and ensures minimal system impact. Trellix suits enterprise needs with extensive security functions, while Webroot offers cost-effective protection for small businesses through easy, cloud-based management.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Webroot offers a more affordable solution, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Webroot offers a more affordable solution, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with central management and database integration. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services integrates adaptive threat protection and cloud features. Trellix suits those needing centralized control, while Trend Micro appeals with cloud capabilities and budget-friendly pricing.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers straightforward setup costs and options, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites is characterized by potentially fluctuating initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in ease and predictability of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers straightforward setup costs and options, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites is characterized by potentially fluctuating initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in ease and predictability of initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in support, pricing, and integration, offering advanced threat detection with automated policies. In comparison, Open EDR's open-source design allows flexibility and customization, making it ideal for tech buyers seeking adaptable security solutions with long-term savings.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward initial setup cost, while Open EDR offers a more flexible pricing model for setup. Notably, Trellix emphasizes ease of integration, unlike Open EDR's focus on customizable deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a straightforward initial setup cost, while Open EDR offers a more flexible pricing model for setup. Notably, Trellix emphasizes ease of integration, unlike Open EDR's focus on customizable deployment options.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers powerful threat prevention with antivirus, encryption, and firewall management, ideal for organizations needing comprehensive endpoint focus. In comparison, NetWitness NDR specializes in network threat detection, suitable for buyers prioritizing advanced network traffic analysis over endpoint management.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while NetWitness NDR involves a higher initial investment but provides advanced network detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while NetWitness NDR involves a higher initial investment but provides advanced network detection capabilities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with robust centralized management, offering features like antivirus and device control. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client emphasizes rollback capability, with extensive OS support for efficient endpoint management, catering to those seeking budget-friendly solutions and quick threat protection.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost structure, while SonicWall Capture Client requires a fixed initial expenditure. Trellix's adaptable pricing can be beneficial for dynamic environments, contrasting SonicWall's straightforward, predictable cost setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a flexible setup cost structure, while SonicWall Capture Client requires a fixed initial expenditure. Trellix's adaptable pricing can be beneficial for dynamic environments, contrasting SonicWall's straightforward, predictable cost setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager offers comprehensive threat management and strong support appealing to IT administrators. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform attracts with advanced prevention techniques and extensive feature compatibility, although it requires more configuration and higher initial investment, justifying long-term ROI.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a substantial initial setup cost, contrasting with Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's lower setup expense. This stark difference highlights Ivanti's investment focus compared to Trellix's budget-friendlier option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a substantial initial setup cost, contrasting with Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's lower setup expense. This stark difference highlights Ivanti's investment focus compared to Trellix's budget-friendlier option.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust centralized management with high customization and comprehensive coverage, ideal for handling multiple components. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection, with advanced behavior analysis and deployment flexibility, suits environments requiring extensive endpoint protection and integrated threat detection capabilities.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process with clear cost expectations, contrasting with Trend Micro Smart Protection, which involves a more complex initial configuration that can increase the setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup process with clear cost expectations, contrasting with Trend Micro Smart Protection, which involves a more complex initial configuration that can increase the setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security emphasizes strong management and integration, addressing varied needs with advanced features. In comparison, Sophos EPP Suite focuses on synchronized security and affordability, appealing to cost-conscious buyers who require effective network threat prevention within diverse environments.
Download Sophos EPP Suite vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly Sophos EPP Suite, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly Sophos EPP Suite, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two security solutions.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)